Greenways III: Policy and Practice Disaster

Permalink +

Fri, Feb 27, 2009, 7:11 pm  //  Guest writer

Barbara Ryan, Terry Bornemann and Gene Knutson, all members of the Bellingham City Council, have submitted this guest article.
--------

Until now, we have chosen to let our record speak for itself on the Greenways III issue, which has been painful, divisive, and caused us many nights of lost sleep.

Recent accusations about our actions now require us to respond. We will not accuse others of lying, as we have been accused. Rather we will chronicle the history of this troubled plan as we see it and as we lived it.

For those citizens new to Bellingham, you may know that the 85 acres called Chuckanut Ridge, or Fairhaven Highlands, has been the object of discussion since the first Greenway levy passed in 1990. In fact, it was this property that spurred southside citizens to organize the first Greenways Levy, hoping that the Levy would provide funds to protect the property as wildlife habitat and trail corridor. Unfortunately, the previous owner and the City were unable to agree on a price, and the property was eventually sold to its current owners, Horizon Bank and Greenbriar Associates.

The property continued to be important to many in our community. Its wetlands are the headwaters of two salmon-bearing streams - Padden Creek and Chuckanut Creek. Its 50 to 80-year old trees, forest floor, and wetlands are home to many varieties of birds and mammals. It is contiguous to a several hundred yards of the Interurban Trail, offering a near-wilderness experience for hikers of all ages and abilities.

The problem is that the property is inside city limits, zoned for high density development (739 units on 85 acres, minus significant wetlands). That has made the price higher than the Greenways Committee has been willing to pay.

After the Greenways II levy expired, Mayor Mark Asmundson appointed a third Greenways Committee to begin organizing a third levy campaign. He asked John Blethen to head this effort. John asked several others to join him including Del Lowry and Jack Weiss, currently a member of City Council.

This group was opposed to acquiring Chuckanut Ridge because of the price and because the city had acquired other Greenways properties in the area, including property around Hoag's Pond. The need for parks and open space was clearly in the north end of town.

But the desire to acquire Chuckanut Ridge was still strong among some citizens, who formed their own group. This group agreed that the highest need for parks and open space is on the north end of town. But it also felt that Chuckanut Ridge should be acquired as open space, environmental laboratory, trail corridor, tree canopy and animal habitat.

Months of meetings ensued. Both groups met separately and together many times to try to reach consensus. Heated debate, often beyond any reasonable rules of engagement, hardened feelings. Many members of the Council were involved in these debates, trying to find consensus. The three of us, and Joan Beardsley, after months of listening, decided on our positions, which we made known in public. Only the details remained to be worked through.

It's all on tape.

About the time that this item hit our Council agenda, Bellingham began video taping both afternoon work sessions and evening meetings. In fact, the full discussion of the March 10, 2006 meetings in which we discussed the Greenways III proposal can be seen on-line. (Call the Council office, 778-8200, for information about how to access the video of these meetings).

After several hours of discussion and straw votes, most of which were split 4-3 with Terry Bornemann, Barbara Ryan, Gene Knutson, and Joan Beardsley favoring allocating $8 million to Chuckanut Ridge and $12 million to north side acquisitions (this was not the only acquisition money in the levy proposal), and Louise Bjornson, John Watts, and Bob Ryan opposed to any acquisition proposal for Chuckanut Ridge, we were at an impasse. Mayor Mark Asmundson and Council President Gene Knutson begged for a solution to which most of us could agree. It makes little sense to send a proposal to the public for a vote on which the Council is split.

Finally, Joan Beardsley suggested that "In addition to $6 million to acquire Chuckanut Ridge, we set aside an additional $2 million to be used to acquire the property, if necessary."

During this discussion, Terry and I asked Mayor Asmundson to clarify our proposal. We wanted the public to know what was being discussed so that they could vote based on whether they agreed with the proposal. He clearly said that "What you are proposing is to spend $6 million, plus $2 million if necessary, which is a total of $8 million to purchase Chuckanut Ridge and, at the end of the day, that is how the staff will interpret this vote." We believed that the Mayor, staff, and citizens understood that this was the Council intent.

John Watts had nothing to do with this compromise. But he went along with it, as did the entire Council (7-0), because he knew that no mention of the specific property, or our specific recommendation for an amount to be spent to acquire all or part of the property, would be included in ballot language. He voted for the proposal, knowing that he could then accuse the majority of not having made any decision at all because no mention of $8 million for Chuckanut Ridge would be specifically in the ordinance.

Just who were we fooling?

Past Greenways practice says that no specified dollar amount will be set aside for any specific property. If developers understand the city's financial limits, the city's bargaining position will be severely compromised.

After all this discussion, it was probably more clear to the developer than to anyone what the council had decided. But the final language of the ordinance, and an accompanying outline of potential Greenways III expenditures, never made this explicit.

The omission of this language in the ordinance was probably a huge mistake. We weren't fooling the developer. But we did not make Council intent clear to the public nor to the people who were supporting the levy. We believed that the omission was standard procedure, to protect the City. Instead, it turned out to be the pivot point on which the anti-Chuckanut Ridge folks hung their "you don't have it in writing, and thus you have nothing" hats. We have been accused of lying. We have been charged with everything from collusion to fraud.

Collusion?

Joan Beardsley, who died in office in 2007, isn't here to defend herself. But the written record testifies to the fact that she attended a Greenways meeting and suggested that the Greenways Committee not bring requests for funds for southside acquisition because the four Council had already made their positions clear to spend $6 million, plus to $2 million if necessary, on the Chuckanut Ridge property. She was bullied into recanting her statement. She knew that four Council members, including herself, had, independently, concluded that they would support this proposal.

Charges of collusion are neither fair nor true. After months meeting with both Greenways groups, most of us came to conclusions based on what we heard. We made these determinations independently, as did those who opposed acquiring Chuckanut Ridge.

What concerns us most is the question that Chuckanut Ridge opponents have sown about their government and this process. The secretive property acquisition process itself is rife for these accusations. These are among the very few discussions that can be held in Executive Session, without public scrutiny. In order to continue to set aside land for parks and open spaces, some confidentiality must be maintained.

But what this process shows is that same need for confidentiality has created rifts and fissures and a lack of trust for the process, and ultimately, for our ability to govern ourselves.

Where we are now.

On January 12, the Greenways and Parks Boards decided that no more than $4 million of the $44 million levy should be spent on the Fairhaven Highlands property, known as Chuckanut Ridge. They made their recommendation public, for the first time, in the Council packet published Thursday, January 8.

Council decided, 6-1 (Stan Snapp opposed), to postpone any decision on this property, and to not bring forward any potential Greenways purchases for southside properties until after the Environmental Impact Statement now being prepared by the developer has been submitted and studied. This will give all of us a better indication of the value of the Chuckanut Ridge property.

It is our hope that we can acquire some or all of the Chuckanut Ridge property using Greenways funds. That will depend, of course, on who sits on Council when that final vote is taken. We hope citizens make their preferences known.

Larry Horowitz  //  Sat, Feb 28, 2009, 11:51 am

Dear Barbara, Gene and Terry,

Thank you for writing this column and having the courage to speak publicly.  You have made us proud by taking the high road and demonstrating your integrity. 

Best,
Larry Horowitz


Vince Biciunas  //  Sun, Mar 01, 2009, 2:00 am

The silence is deafening, isn’t it? It just goes to show what a hot button topic Chuckanut Ridge remains.

I concur with Larry in thanking Barbara, Terry and Gene for writing this guest editorial.

It certainly is easier reading than John Watts’ accusations of last week. I am still a bit shocked that he hit the send button on that one. We’re not used to it, I guess.

The description here by the three sitting Council Members matches much more closely with my memories of Greenways votes past and assurances made about 6 plus 2 and why that couldn’t be articulated in the Greenways language at the time. I am only sorry now that it looks like I might have been duped. Lesson 1: Read the fine print, always. Lesson 2: Eternal vigilance….

My fervent hope is that Chuckanut Ridge remains forested, and moreover, that we (all the people of Bellingham) do not tear ourselves up over it. Maybe this economic downturn and the EIS will have a silver lining for us.

Peace,
Vince Biciunas


Steve Wilson  //  Sun, Mar 01, 2009, 2:24 pm

“Comes a time when the blind man takes your hand, says ‘Don’t you see’?”  (Hunter/Garcia)

Thanks Terry, Barbara, and Gene for your thoughtful words.  Also thanks to Joan for her persistent pursuit of the truth during her brief term on the council.

We will get through this dark period of local history.  Although we have suffered through four years of silence and misinformation, we are no longer groping around in the Land of As(mundson).

I’m confident that the upcoming Environmental Impact Statement will be widely discussed in our community.  As a result, the path ahead will become much clearer.

We will re-affirm our committment to protecting our Critical Areas because the cost of not doing so is priceless.

Steve Wilson


Christopher Grannis  //  Sun, Mar 01, 2009, 9:29 pm

Thank you Barbara Terry and Gene for your unwavering integrity and courage to stand up to those who don’t want to acknowledge the truth.

I have been paying close attention to this issue since 2005 so I would like to point out one inaccuracy. Although I agree that Joan was subjected to an intimidation campaign, She did not recant her statement before Council on August 7th 2006. The Video of that meeting shows that she did not contradict her original statement to the GAC on July 20th:

Council member Joan Beardsley commented that in March 2006, she, along with three other City Council Members, in order to place the levy on the ballot, committed to support the application of the $2 million labeled ?Undesignated acquisitions? along with the full $6 million designated to ?Southside acquisitions? to purchase the Chuckanut Ridge property. She said that she intended to honor her commitment and that the Greenways Committee should not expect those funds to be available for other southside acquisitions.

Joan was a word smith and she was very careful with her words. I quote from the video the central part of her statement: ... “In reading the minutes of the meeting and hearing back what others thought I was saying, I have discovered that I spoke as if I were representing Council and not as if I were giving my impressions that came from that open discussion. What I said makes it sound as if some members of this council had made a commitment outside of the public meeting to support a purchase of Chuckanut Ridge. This is absolutely untrue. Nothing of the sort took place or would take place. This is too professional and caring a group of Council members to permit such a breach of public confidence.”

Another version of what she said came from the people who oppose saving Chuckanut Ridge that inserts the word “prior” before the word commitment, and omits the words “outside of the public meeting.”

The Video of the 8/7/06 City Council Meeting is available from BTV10 at 625 Halleck St.

The Council meetings in March 2006 were confused due to the prohibition of mentioning dollar amounts with acquisition targets, so it is not surprising that many people failed to understand that, in order to place the levy on the ballot, A majority of council members had made the commitment.
It is very sad that so many of those people refuse to acknowledge the truth and instead
choose to attack the integrity of those four Council Members.

The problem is the process that required the council to put a levy on the ballot without allowing them to say clearly what they meant, and a levy that meant different things to different voters. Another problem with the process is that it includes a self perpetrating Greenways committee dominated by people who oppose acquiring the property that most exemplifies what Greenways is all about. I hope these problems can be solved because I fear there will not be another Greenways unless they are.


Greenways III: Policy and Practice Disaster

Fri, Feb 27, 2009, 7:11 pm  //  Guest writer

Barbara Ryan, Terry Bornemann and Gene Knutson, all members of the Bellingham City Council, have submitted this guest article.
--------

Until now, we have chosen to let our record…

4 comments; last on Mar 01, 2009

The Roeder Home needs volunteers

Fri, Feb 27, 2009, 12:14 am  //  Sheri Ward

Wednesday evening marked the last scheduled concert of the Whatcom County Homemade Music Society (HMS), a group that has held concerts at the Roeder Home for more than…

0 comments

Johns Repair

Specializing in German vehicles...

Banking and Revolution

Sat, Feb 21, 2009, 6:24 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

It is difficult to appreciate the momentousness of the moment at hand as the struggle to resolve matters swirling in the banking sector come to the critical pass.…

6 comments; last on Feb 24, 2009

Opinion for hire: Part 1

Fri, Feb 20, 2009, 9:57 am  //  Larry Horowitz

Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Jungle, Upton Sinclair observed, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.

4 comments; last on Feb 23, 2009

Self Fulfilling Profits

Thu, Feb 19, 2009, 11:07 am  //  g.h.kirsch

Our friend over at The Syre Times continues with great circularity to confound the growth debate. And what better way to begin than misstating the position of those…

3 comments; last on Feb 20, 2009

Alternative “A” for county growth

Tue, Feb 17, 2009, 6:54 pm  //  Guest writer

Dave Pros has the guest column. Dave served on the Whatcom County Planning Commission and has followed the GMA process for many years.
---------

Tonight at 7 pm at the…

1 comments; last on Feb 20, 2009

Give a Damn for the Greenback Dollar

Mon, Feb 16, 2009, 8:19 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

Lest you think our current financial crisis is unprecedented, it's not. These crises have been occurring since the Dark Ages; probably earlier. They always are tied to the…

6 comments; last on Feb 17, 2009

The Numbers Gamesmanship

Sat, Feb 14, 2009, 1:35 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

Over at what some call The Syre Times, this week the editor offered up some gristle that is pretty hard to swallow.

Discussing the competing visions for population…

6 comments; last on Feb 19, 2009

Infill, Sinfill & Sprawl

Thu, Feb 12, 2009, 8:36 pm  //  Larry Horowitz

Have you ever wondered how truly livable cities become undesirable hell holes? Do the people who run these highly attractive areas into the ground merely fail to comprehend…

2 comments; last on Feb 16, 2009

Not Too Big to Fail

Tue, Feb 10, 2009, 11:25 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

The President's dynamic duo, Larry Summers and Tim Geithner, tell us, “governments make poor bank managers.” Geithner, our brand spankin' new Secretary of the Treasury, goes on. “W

0 comments

Population Projections: Futurewise speaks

Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 11:54 pm  //  Larry Horowitz

If you are new to Whatcom County (or have been hiding under a rock for the last several years), you may not be familiar with the gut-wrenching process…

0 comments

Yogi Berra and the Library Board

Sun, Feb 08, 2009, 10:06 pm  //  Guest writer

Marilyn Olsen has contributed this article. She was president of the Friends of the Fairhaven Library for 2007 and 2008.
----

When Yogi Berra observed, “It’s like déjà

3 comments; last on Feb 10, 2009

Top ten list for the next buyer of Chuckanut Ridge / Fairhaven Highlands

Sat, Feb 07, 2009, 11:17 am  //  Larry Horowitz

If you happen to find yourself in the market for an 82-acre hilly swamp wholly encumbered by critical areas like steep slopes and mature-forested Category 1 wetlands in…

0 comments

From the Pollyanna News Service

Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 7:24 am  //  g.h.kirsch

The good news in Washington this week is the emerging bipartisan antipathy for taxation.

Our investigative team has discovered a new Democratic program that was being quietly led…

0 comments

Much ado about nothing … or… Why the Fairhaven Highlands EIS is meaningless

Wed, Feb 04, 2009, 12:54 pm  //  Larry Horowitz

Please don’t misunderstand. I’m not claiming that the Fairhaven Highlands environmental impact statement (EIS) does not have the potential to be meaningful. However, in its present form,

9 comments; last on Feb 05, 2009

An American Poem

Tue, Feb 03, 2009, 1:54 pm  //  Ham Hayes

Tax cheats, lobbyists and crooks
Lined up at your door.
Struggle, struggle, cook the books
How ya gonna get off the floor

Come on Prez
Toss the bums out
Clean up this mess
Sho

4 comments; last on Feb 05, 2009

How Horizon Bank chose greed over the safety of its community

Tue, Feb 03, 2009, 1:05 am  //  Larry Horowitz

I really pity Horizon Bank’s CEO Rich Jacobson. His predecessor, Laury Evans, sure left him a bad hand to play. Not only is Mr. Jacobson faced with the…

2 comments; last on Mar 02, 2009

Just An Insignificant Little Road

Mon, Feb 02, 2009, 8:57 am  //  g.h.kirsch

While it went almost unheralded Friday, Kremen & Co temporarily backed away from their earlier position that driving a road into the forest on Squalicum Mountain, to…

4 comments; last on Feb 03, 2009

 

Election Info

Candidate Filings

Primary election results

Whatcom Auditor

Coal, Oil & Trains

Community Wise Bellingham

Powder River Basin R. C.

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Cascadia Weekly
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light

Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut Community Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham

Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW

Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Recreation Northwest
Sailing Anarchy

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The

Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
TED
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
Vox
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Police Activity

Bellingham Register
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders