Hope for Chuckanut Ridge

Permalink +

Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 3:20 pm  //  Larry Horowitz

If you are interested in saving Chuckanut Ridge, there is some glimmer of hope for preserving this ecologically-rich and environmentally-sensitive property. If you are willing to make a single phone call and/or send a single email to prevent Horizon Bank’s Fairhaven Highlands project from destroying this mature urban forest, which serves as the headwaters to two salmon-bearing streams, a wildlife sanctuary, and an extensive network of high-value wetlands… please read on.

Violations of the 1994 FDIC Order

Banking and real estate development are like oil and water; they don’t mix. Banking relies on a relationship business model designed to keep customers happy and loyal. By contrast, real estate development is a transactional business designed to make one-time profits for developers before they move on to another project. Real estate developers are comfortable creating enemies of local residents. Bankers are not.

For that reason, real estate development has long been considered as an “activity that is not permissible” for FDIC-insured banks. Banks can apply for an exception, and, in 1994, the FDIC approved Horizon Bank’s application to engage in real estate development activities subject to four conditions. The two most critical conditions are impacted by the bank’s Fairhaven Highlands development application.

Condition 2: “That activities be limited to the development of real estate intended for single-family residential use;” and

Condition 3: “That the applicant's aggregate investment in the activity at any one time not exceed 25% of its Tier 1 capital.”

It is clear that Fairhaven Highlands, a multi-family development, violates Condition 2. The original application proposes the construction of 558 multi-family units, or 76% of the 739-unit total. The other alternatives being considered propose the construction of either 688 multi-family units (93%) or 722 multi-family units (98%). Horizon Bank’s declared preference is to build 722 multi-family units. It would be hard to convince anyone - especially the FDIC - that the Fairhaven Highlands project is intended for “single-family residential use.”

Conclusion: Fairhaven Highlands violates Condition 2.

Condition 3 is a moving target because the bank’s investment in the project and its Tier 1 capital are constantly changing. According to Horizon Bank’s June 30, 2009 quarterly report, its “real estate joint venture has a consolidated carrying amount of $27.2 million.” In other words, its investment in real estate development activities has mushroomed to $27.2 million as of June 30. According to the Horizon’s Uniform Bank Performance Report, its Tier 1 capital as of June 30 is $45.3 million. Therefore, the bank’s real estate investment now represents 60% of its Tier 1 capital (27.2 / 45.3), a far cry from the 25% limit imposed by the 1994 FDIC Order.

Conclusion: Fairhaven Highlands violates Condition 3.

So, Horizon Bank has violated two key conditions of the FDIC Order.

Does anyone really care?

Well, apparently the FDIC does, and this is where you come in.

We have been told that FDIC attorney Jim Miller and the FDIC Case Manager Richard Evans “are in constant communication regarding Horizon Bank.” According to Mr. Miller, “the issues involved in this matter have been the subject of many discussions within the FDIC,” and the FDIC will “ensure that the units that may be ultimately approved by the city of Bellingham for construction on the site are, in fact, intended for single-family residential use and that the Bank remains in compliance with condition #2.” Additionally, the FDIC “will continue to closely monitor the Bank’s investment in this regard to ensure that the Bank remains in compliance with condition #3.”

In a recent email from Mr. Miller, he closed by stating, “We appreciate receiving your information.”

How you can make a difference

Every person who either opposes Fairhaven Highlands and/or supports the preservation of Chuckanut Ridge has their own personal reasons for doing so. These personal views need to be respected.

If you either oppose Fairhaven Highlands or support the preservation of Chuckanut Ridge – for whatever personal reasons you have – you can make a difference by focusing on this single issue.

Horizon Bank has violated two important conditions of the 1994 FDIC Order that allowed the bank – as an exception to standard banking law - to engage in the real estate development business. The FDIC has the authority – indeed, the responsibility - to order Horizon Bank to cease and desist from pursuing the Fairhaven Highlands development, a project that violates the 1994 FDIC Order.

It’s really that simple.

If you want to make a difference, I urge you to contact FDIC Attorney Jim Miller and encourage the FDIC to properly enforce the conditions of the 1994 FDIC Order. Let Mr. Miller know why you oppose this project and/or support the preservation of Chuckanut Ridge. Mr. Miller is very cordial and has expressed an interest in hearing from us.

Jim Miller’s direct line is: (415) 808-8175.

If you prefer to send an email (or would like to follow up by email):

Jim Miller’s email address is: JMiller@FDIC.gov

Richard Evans’ email address is: REvans@FDIC.gov.

For those who have wondered how you can make a difference, I hope you will.

Time is of the essence. Please call Mr. Miller today!

Related Links:

-> 1994 FDIC Order and Conditions
-> Horizon Bank's Uniform Bank Performance Report / Tier 1 Capital
-> Horizon Bank's June 30, 2009 Quarterly Report

Larry Horowitz  //  Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 6:21 am

First, I would like to thank all of you who have already called and/or emailed FDIC attorney Jim Miller and FDIC Case Manager Richard Evans.  I especially thank those of you who have sent copies of your emails to me and have emailed me to let me know you have called.  Please continue to do so.

A number of people have asked for suggestions about what to say when they call Mr. Miller.  I believe the following list of questions might be helpful:

1) Is the 1994 FDIC Order - which restricts Horizon Bank to single-family residential development comprising no more than 25% of its Tier 1 capital ? STILL IN EFFECT?  Has the Order been modified in any way?

2) Is there any question that Horizon Bank?s Fairhaven Highlands project is a predominantly multi-family development in clear violation of Condition 2 of the FDIC Order, which restricts the bank to single-family projects?

3) Is it true that Horizon Bank has invested $27.2 million in its real estate development activities? 

(To confirm, click on the ?Related Link? above for Horizon Bank?s June 30, 2009 Quarterly Report.  In the ?Find? box of the PDF, type in ?27.2? and click enter to search.  You?ll be taken to the last paragraph on page 29 of the PDF (page 24 of the actual report) where you?ll find this sentence, ?As of June 30, 2009, the real estate joint venture had a consolidated carrying amount of $27.2 million...;?)

4) Is it true that Horizon Bank?s Tier 1 capital is $45.3 million as of June 30, 2009?

(To confirm, click on the ?Related Link? above for Horizon Bank?s Uniform Bank Performance Report.  You?ll see that the bank?s ?Net Tier One? as of 6/30/09 is $45,301,000.  This is the fifth number in the first column of numbers.)

5)  Does Horizon Bank?s investment in its real estate development activities represent 60% of its Tier 1 capital as of June 30? 

(This is simply the ratio of $27.2 million to $45.3 million, or 60%.)

6) Is there any question that Horizon Bank has violated Condition 3 of the FDIC Order, which limits the bank?s investment to 25% of its Tier 1 capital?

7) Did Horizon Bank intentionally ignore the conditions of the FDIC Order or were they simply negligent in their compliance?  Are they out of compliance with any other FDIC conditions or requirements?

8) When did the FDIC first discover these violations?

9) What has been Horizon Bank?s response?

10) Does the City of Bellingham know that the FDIC plans to enforce its 1994 Order and will ?ensure that the units that may be ultimately approved by the city of Bellingham for construction on this site are, in fact, intended for single-family residential use.?

11) Why has Horizon Bank spent more than $200,000 on an EIS for a multi-family project if they can only pursue a permit for single-family development?  Isn?t that a substantial waste of time and money, not only for Horizon Bank, but for city staff and the 17 federal, state, local and tribal agencies currently reviewing this 500-page document?

12) When does the FDIC plan to enforce the conditions of its 1994 Order?

13) What can the public do to ensure Horizon Bank?s compliance?

Tip Johnson  //  Sat, Oct 03, 2009, 1:50 pm

After a quick review of the new plans, I remain unconvinced that they could even build this project without breaking their already teetering bank.  I think it is a ruse.

I am commenting to the FDIC that the project is more likely an attempt at blackmail and fraud against the Greenways Levy, that the plans are nothing more than scary pictures of a horrific environmental catastrophe, and a tragedy to neighborhood character, designed to squeeze top dollar out of the public coffers. That’s a bad plan for a so-called community bank.

I am suggesting a subpoena to the state of Delaware to finally reveal the original consolidators of the property, principals of the West-Eden Land Development corporation officed in Lynden, who originally benefited from the illegal rezone that added so much phantom value to the property and created the mess we witness today.

This key piece of information would establish the chain of ownership and become critical to understanding the conundrum of this projects ability to survive, answering the question of why the city did none of the things they should have done that would have limited the project’s damage, and did many things they shouldn’t have that preserved the project.

To me, it looks like a bunch of family and friends trying to make the most out of a piece of essentially undevelopable property.  It was not developed for over a century because of environmental constraints, long before the importance of wetlands and salmon streams was recognized.

Today, the prospect is literally absurd. Something fishy is going on - and not in the 90 million gallons of pure, clean water that the property delivers to tributaries of Padden and Chuckanut creeks every year.

I know the FDIC will not share my personal conclusion, but here it is: Up with the Woods, Down with the Bank!

Larry Horowitz  //  Sun, Oct 04, 2009, 9:51 am

The following letter was sent to FDIC attorney Miller and FDIC Case Manager Evans by Bellingham resident and former Deputy Attorney General for the California Dept of Justice, Michael Botwin:

Dear Mr. Miller and Mr. Evans,

I am a Bellingham resident and I am sending this e-mail to urge the FDIC to take action against Horizon Bank for its violation of the 1994 FDIC order.  That order permits Horizon Bank, through its wholly owned subsidiary (Westward Financial Services Corp.), to engage in certain types of real estate development activities provided those activities are limited to “the development of real estate intended for single-family residential use” and its “aggregate investment in the activity at any one time [does] not exceed 25% of its Tier 1 capital.”  (See FDIC Order, ?? 2 and 3.)  I believe Horizon Bank has arrogantly and defiantly violated both those provisions in regard to its development of Fairhaven Highlands. 

As you know, Fairhaven Highlands (also known as Chuckanut Ridge) was purchased in 2005 by Westward Financial Services Corp. as part of a joint venture with Greenbriar Northwest LLC (hereinafter “Greenbriar”).  Horizon Bank never intended to comply with the FDIC order in regard to Fairhaven Highlands by limiting it to single-family dwellings.  On April 18, 2005, Greenbriar filed Subdivision Variance Application and a SEPA Environmental Checklist with the Bellingham Planning and Community Development Department (hereinafter “Planning Department”).  The Variance Application described the project as “Residential - Multiple Planned.”  (See Variance Application, ? 8.)  The SEPA application contained more detail and described the project as follows:

“THE OVERALL PROJECT COVERS SOME 85 ACRES.  THE 739 ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL UNITS WILL BE SINGLE DETACHED, COMMON WALL, TOWNHOUSE, TRIPLEX, NINE-PLEX, AND MEDUM-RISE BUILDINGS ARE PLANNED.  [SEPA Application, p. 2, ? 16.]  . . . THERE ARE SEVERAL 8-10 STORY BUILDINGS WITHIN THE CURRENT PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.  [SEPA Application, p. 9, ? 9(a).] ” 

Copies of these two documents can be viewed on the City of Bellingham’s official web page at + Link under the topic “Applications.”  It seems to me that Horizon Bank intended to violate FDIC’s order from the initiation of the Fairhaven Highlands project and never intended to limit it to “single-family residential use” as required by the order.

The Fairhaven Highlands project caused public outrage from the start.  Horizon Bank’s and Greenbriar’s in-your-face attitude exacerbated the public’s resentment over the project.  At a meeting with approximately 500 local residents, David Edelstein stated, “We bought density” when explaining how Horizon Bank and Greenbriar intended to replace the forested mountain that frames the southern border of Bellingham with 10-story high-rises and with other multi-story buildings. 

Signs containing statements such as “Stop Horizon Bank from Destroying Chuckanut Ridge” started appearing throughout the South side of town.  Residents organized.  Responsible Development, a non-profit corporation, was created to fight the development.  (See + Link.)  RD hired a prominent Seattle land-use attorney to fight the project and has already spent over $40,000 in fighting Horizon Bank’s project.  More recently, another group (Friends of Chuckanut) also joined the fight against Fairhaven Highlands.

The Fairhaven Highlands development is described as one of the “Top Issues” on the City of Bellingham’s website.  The city acknowledges that the Fairhaven Highlands “proposal has provoked significant community debate. Many area residents are opposed to developing Chuckanut Ridge, which is one of the last large, wooded properties remaining within City limits. They say they prefer to see it preserved for open space or recreational use, they are concerned about protecting sensitive environmental features, and they are concerned about traffic and other neighborhood impacts.”  (See + Link.) 

On September 29, 2009, the Draft Environmental Impact Study of this parcel was finally released by the City.  (Note that Greenbriar is responsible for paying for this report, which exceeds 560 pages.) A local newspaper, The Bellingham Herald headlined this issue, reporting that the Fairhaven Highlands project “is the most controversial one inside city limits in recent memory.” (To read the full DEIS online, see + Link and click on “Fairhaven Highlands? under “Top Issues”)

Patrice Clark, a member of a prominent Bellingham family that donated a sizable parcel of waterfront land to a land trust for the public benefit, terminated her sizable business dealings with Horizon Bank in protest to the Fairhaven Highlands project.  In her October 24, 2007 letter to Horizon Bank, she states the following:

“I shared my concerns about Horizon Bank?s involvement with the Chuckanut Ridge development. I was hoping to hear that your bank would decide that developing this land was not in the bank’s best interest and that you would want to be seen in this community as a “good neighbor‟ and sell to the city of Bellingham, reinvesting in other properties that would not encourage sprawl as this development would do. Unfortunately, you did not see it that way .  .  .  [?]  There still is time to rethink your bank’s investment.  I hope you and your board members will seriously reconsider your option to partner with the city of Bellingham to find a way to finance transfer of this ‘gem’ to public ownership and preservation.”  (See + Link Clark Horizon Bank letter.pdf.) 

Other customers also cancelled their accounts with Horizon Bank for similar reasons.

Each year, local residents picket Horizon Bank’s Shareholders’ Meeting in protest.  Some residents even purchased 1 share of Horizon Bank stock so they could attend the annual shareholders’ meeting.  It was reported that during its July 21, 2009 meeting, Lawrence Evans and Richard Jacobson (Chairman and President, respectively) claimed Horizon Bank was in compliance with the 1994 FDIC order and furthermore, the FDIC did not care about compliance with its order.

Equally disturbing is the bank’s failure to limit its investment in real estate developments to no more than 25% of its Tier 1 capital and then misrepresenting its financial status to shareholders.  Horizon Bank’s investment in its real estate developments is substantially more than twice limit imposed by the FDIC.  Worse yet, the bank’s President purportedly misrepresented the bank’s financial status to shareholders at the last shareholders’ meeting.  He allegedly stated that the bank had only invested $18 million in the Fairhaven HIghlands project instead of the $27.2 million it had actually invested and that the Bank had $90 million in Tier 1 capital instead of the $45.3 million it actually had.  In fact, the Bank had lost 50% of its Tier 1 equity in 3 months!  It is my understanding that the purpose of a community bank is to serve the needs of the community and not to deceive it or destroy one of its ecological gems.

Many Bellingham residents have expended substantial time and money to fight Horizon Bank’s Fairhaven Highlands project in order to preserve a unique parcel of land that is a big part of Bellingham’s character.  Among them, Dr. John McLaughlin, a professor of Environmental Science at Western Washington University, explained in numerous letters how the proposed Fairhaven Highlands project would be devastating to the local environment and how preservation of that property offers a unique educational opportunity to grade schools and to the university.  It is the only parcel of land in the country within walking distance of schools and the university wherein field environmental training can be provided.  (See + Link)

I have been a Deputy Attorney General for the California Department of Justice for around 34 years until my retirement in 2003, at which time I moved to Bellingham.  I enforced California’s consumer protection and white collar crime statutes during most of my tenure.  I prosecuted numerous cases at the request of various state, local, and, on occasion, federal agencies.  I strongly believe it is important for agencies to enforce their orders.  The failure to do so results in the lack of public confidence in the agency and a lack of respect of those who are regulated.  It promotes lawlessness rather than compliance and deterrence. 

The Draft Environmental Impact Study has been completed and the period for public comment is ticking.  Now is the time for the FDIC to act and enforce its order.  Its failure to do so will cause numerous members of the public and public agencies to spend countless hours evaluating the 500+ page report and commenting upon it.  All this time, effort, and expense will be wasted if the FDIC ultimately intends to prohibit the proposed multi-unit project.

Sincerely,

Michael Botwin

UPDATE: City of Bham Moonlighting Issue - More Documents

Mon, Jan 30, 2012, 10:58 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley updates us on the latest facts coming to light about City of Bellingham employee moonlighting

2 comments; last on Feb 01, 2012

Compliance, Noncompliance and Invalidity in Whatcom County

Sun, Jan 29, 2012, 10:16 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The County's rural planning actions have not just failed to comply with the GMA...they have contradicted the goals of the GMA.

2 comments; last on Feb 01, 2012

Open thru February - Village Books has opened a shop at Bellis Faire Mall - next to Macy's.

A Worm’s Eye View of our local WorkSource Center

Wed, Jan 25, 2012, 9:42 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley visits the local WorkSource center and interviews the regional director

0 comments

Watch out for basement flooding

Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 9:03 pm  //  Paul de Armond

Stormwater surge may back up sewers

5 comments; last on Jan 21, 2012

The Political Junkie interviews Kathy Kershner

Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 4:29 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley discusses the Jail, Jack Louws, and an impartial council with our new Council Chair

1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2012

SOPA - A Step in Destroying Democracy

Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 12:17 am  //  John Servais

NWCitizen.com went black for Wednesday, Jan 18, 2012, as a protest against proposed legislation, SOPA and PIPA. Here is what was posted.

1 comments; last on Jan 19, 2012

Why SOPA is so terrible

Tue, Jan 17, 2012, 6:28 pm  //  John Servais

On Wednesday, thousands of websites will go dark to show opposition to SOPA. I will be posting a single article explaining who SOPA is so bad.

0 comments

Planning Commissioner Mocks Environmental Concern For Coal Terminal

Sat, Jan 14, 2012, 11:06 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Planning Commissioner Onkels should recuse himself from review of environmental impacts at GPT.

2 comments; last on Jan 16, 2012

Jack Petree, Olympia, the Whatcom Council and Obama’s Inner Circle

Wed, Jan 11, 2012, 8:04 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Latest from the Political Junkie on a variety of subjects

7 comments; last on Jan 15, 2012

Commmunity Governance at its Best

Mon, Jan 09, 2012, 8:27 pm  //  Tip Johnson

We have a new mayor!

4 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012

Property Rights Protected Under Lake Whatcom Stormwater Proposal

Sun, Jan 08, 2012, 11:02 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The County's proposed stormwater regulations for Lake Whatcom will increase development without improving water quality

2 comments; last on Jan 20, 2012

Riley Rouses Row Over Domestic Violence

Sun, Jan 08, 2012, 1:21 am  //  John Servais

Issue is County Council member Kathy Kershner and how our social service programs are funded.

3 comments; last on Jan 08, 2012

Some thoughts on the Occupy Bellingham issue

Sun, Jan 01, 2012, 12:05 am  //  John Servais

A third note on Jan 1 about the Herald photos with links. And previous thoughts on the trivia around the militarized evictions.

9 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012

Kelli Linville has taken oath as mayor

Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 2:07 pm  //  John Servais

Kelli assumes office of mayor at midnight Dec 31

6 comments; last on Jan 02, 2012

Bellingham Herald removes comments

Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 11:59 am  //  Wendy Harris

Decide for yourself if this blog comment, posted under my own name, should have been flagged and removed from the Bellingham Herald Online Edition.

1 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011

Herald Permits Censorship of Pro-Occupy Bellingham Comments

Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 11:14 am  //  Wendy Harris

Anyone can "flag" a blog posting, resulting in immediate removal of your comment, regardless of merit. This is occuring for comments supporting OB.

1 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011

City Exceeds Scope of Occupy Bellingham Eviction

Wed, Dec 28, 2011, 8:26 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The City infringed on the public’s right to peaceful assembly in a public park by enforcing an inappropriate public safety law

2 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011

Dan Pike Issues Order to Evict Occupy Bellingham

Tue, Dec 27, 2011, 11:55 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley questions Pike's timing, and Occupy's choice of tactics

2 comments; last on Dec 28, 2011

Updates from The Political Junkie

Tue, Dec 20, 2011, 2:19 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Where Riley provides more info on the City of Bellingham employees moonlighting issue and Crawford's ethical troubles

0 comments

Dock Increases Risk of Invasive Species on Lake Whatcom

Sun, Dec 18, 2011, 8:43 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Relocation of a dock to Bloedel Donovan Park underscores failure to protect Lake Whatcom from invasive species

0 comments

Sam Crawford Faces Ethical Concerns . . . AGAIN

Thu, Dec 15, 2011, 12:44 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Local blogger Shane Roth files ethical complaint over Crawford's sweetheart deals

3 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011

Planning Commission Fails to Remove Cherry Point From Birch Bay Mitigation Plan

Wed, Dec 14, 2011, 7:05 am  //  Wendy Harris

Claiming it is unfair to treat large property owners different than small property owners, the Commission refuses to remove industrial areas from buffer mitigation proposal.

0 comments

Rick Perry, Can We Talk?

Tue, Dec 13, 2011, 9:58 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley has a conversation with Rick Perry

2 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011

For Gift Ideas, Think Beyond Parker Brothers

Sat, Dec 10, 2011, 9:32 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley discusses his love of board games and some good gift ideas

2 comments; last on Dec 11, 2011

The Political Junkie needs your input

Thu, Dec 08, 2011, 12:47 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Please take my reader's survey, I'm planning 2012

0 comments

Loophole Benefits SSA and Undermines Birch Bay Mitigation Proposal

Wed, Dec 07, 2011, 7:00 am  //  Wendy Harris

Tell the Planning Commission to eliminate this loophole

2 comments; last on Dec 14, 2011

Washington United for Marriage: It’s Time!

Tue, Dec 06, 2011, 11:12 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley attends a public meeting on equality

0 comments

The Cole Train: Loads of BS

Sun, Dec 04, 2011, 4:53 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the sooty prospect of economic necessity rears its ugly head

2 comments; last on Dec 04, 2011

Update on Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Proposal

Fri, Dec 02, 2011, 1:08 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Planning Staff's recommended revision will not prevent SSA from reducing wetland buffers.

0 comments

UPDATE: City’s response focused on favoritism, not lost revenue

Wed, Nov 30, 2011, 5:51 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

More on the city employee moonlighting issue

0 comments

TPJ Exclusive: Little Documented Oversight for City Employee Moonlighting

Mon, Nov 28, 2011, 4:29 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

The Political Junkie breaks a story of employee moonlighting within city of Bellingham

7 comments; last on Nov 30, 2011

Deer me!

Sat, Nov 26, 2011, 3:30 pm  //  Tip Johnson

O.K. Who's in charge of all these ungulates?

14 comments; last on Dec 01, 2011

County Proposal Includes New Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Requirements

Tue, Nov 22, 2011, 9:29 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The County's new mitigation proposal is unlikely to be adequate for Cherry Point's industrial impacts to habitat buffers

3 comments; last on Nov 24, 2011

CameraGate:  Red-light safety or city revenue?

Mon, Nov 21, 2011, 1:00 am  //  Guest writer

With budget woes, Bellingham passes on safety in favor of cash. Starting in 2008, Bellingham officials were coached by ATS on how to get Red Light cameras through…

26 comments; last on Nov 29, 2011

Cameras, not coal, decided the election

Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 8:24 pm  //  Paul de Armond

Looking at the numbers for the Bellingham elections

11 comments; last on Nov 22, 2011

Election Analysis: What does it take to win a county seat?

Fri, Nov 18, 2011, 12:28 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley examines Maginnis/Crawford and Kremen/Larson

0 comments

Election Analysis: Dropoff, Lynden Suburbs and the “Buys Bounce”

Thu, Nov 17, 2011, 5:20 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley looks at Lynden and coins some new phrases.

0 comments

Political Junkie Election Analysis: Louws/Ericksen

Wed, Nov 16, 2011, 12:31 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley takes a look at Louws/Ericksen in the search for moderate Republicans

1 comments; last on Nov 17, 2011

Kelli Linville is elected Mayor of Bellingham

Tue, Nov 15, 2011, 5:21 pm  //  John Servais

Results are posted as of 5:21 pm. Use links at top of right side column.

2 comments; last on Nov 15, 2011

Padden Trails Rezone – You Should Be Worried

Tue, Nov 15, 2011, 9:43 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The Padden Trails rezone effort is a misuse of the Infill Tool Kit on the outskirts of Bellingham.

8 comments; last on Nov 16, 2011

Still over 6,000 ballots to count

Mon, Nov 14, 2011, 4:52 pm  //  John Servais

Kelli Linville takes safe lead for mayor of Bellingham. Sam Crawford is leading for county council.

1 comments; last on Nov 14, 2011

 

New links

Colbert Super Pac

Current Interest

Bham Camera Scam
Colbert Super Pac

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald
Bham Politics & Economics
Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Foothills Gazette
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
KGMI
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Northwest Review
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local causes

Bham Camera Scam
Bham CofC political blog
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lake Whatcom
N. Cascades Audubon
N. Sound Conservancy
Neighborhood Schools Coalition
No Leaky Buckets
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Publisher recommended

Americans Elect 2012
Bham Politics & Economics
Community Wise Bellingham
Guardian Unlimited
Paul Krugman - economics
Redistricting WA state
Sweeney Politics
Watts Up With That? - climate
WikiLeaks.ch

NwCitizen 1995 to 2008

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Cascadia

Crosscut Seattle
Joel Connelly
Orcinus
Portland Indy Media
Seattle Indy Media
Washington Votes

Leisure

Adventures NW
Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy

Worth checking out

Al-Jazeera online
Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Americans Elect 2012
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Buzz Flash
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Daily Beast, The
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Politico
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
The Onion
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

Governments

Auditor election page
Bellingham
Bham - PFD
Candidate Filings
Election Results
Redistricting WA state
Skagit County
The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County

Other - for whatever

Ban Red Light Cams
BushFlash.com
Chickehhawks
Coal quandary
Doonesbury
George Bush
Info Clearing House
Mainstreampolitics
Michael Moore
Nat Geo on Coal Trains
Reality News
The Crisis Papers
Third World Traveler
Unity08
Washington Outsiders

Less active

Bellingham Register
Carl Weimer
Eye on Whatcom
John Watts
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
The American Telegraph

Quiet, offline or dead

David Hackworth
Gitmo prisoner 345
Mega Awesome
Not in my county
Parkenfarker
Pro-Whatcom