Save the Woods?
Permalink +Wed, Jan 16, 2008, 2:33 pm // Tip Johnson
Or how to mitigate the illegitimacies of Fairhaven Highlands, AKA Chuckanut Ridge and the Hundred Acre Woods.Sorry, I didn't have time to write something short!
Tonight (1/16/2008) at 6:30 in Municipal Court, citizens will have the opportunity to comment on the scope of an environmental study for the proposed Fairhaven Highlands project, also known as Chuckanut Ridge. This controversial project was first proposed in 1996 but was met with intense public opposition. The property later became the poster child for the Greenways levy, offering the opportunity to enhance and extend Fairhaven Park. Somehow, acquisition was never accomplished. Now the project is back, under the aegis of Horizon Bank and Greenbrier Construction. At issue is the fate of a mature forested wetland that has been identified as a keystone of the food chain in the Interurban corridor connecting the Sehome Hill Arboretum to the Chuckanut Mountains. The property is replete with important wetlands that provide an important source of food and water to various critters and supply important flows of fresh, clean water to both Padden and Chuckanut Creeks during dry periods.
Many tonight will speak to the myriad environmental points subsumed under the State Environmental Protection Act - Water, Air, Land, Habitat, Traffic, etc. And well they should, since the impacts of such intense development will be devastating. My interest has narrowed to focus on two issues.
The owners and other proponents lean on property rights, suggesting that if citizens don't want to see development, then they ought to buy it. Otherwise, the owners have a right to develop. I agree. However, I disagree that the value they imagine is appropriate. More on that later. First, let's make sure we can protect what is ours and effect adequate redress if we fail.
Just downstream from the project, a large, ancient beaver pond forms the headwaters of an unnamed tributary to Chuckanut Creek. This publicly owned wetland pond is teeming with tiny freshwater shrimp and who knows what else. Steelhead trout have been observed, having made their way up the hill from Arroyo Park. It is a haven for birds and area wildlife, a source of pure, fresh water, untainted with petroleum waste or septage.
We need to make sure there is a comprehensive biological inventory of this ecosystem. We know that end-of-pipe stormwater treatment facilities fail during peak storm events, flushing their contents and discharging a toxic jolt of accumulated waste. The City has no program for maintaining such facilities, instead relying on the property owners whose record for such diligence is dismal. If we are going to build a bunch of homes, with roofs, lawns and landscaping, parking lots and dumpster depots, will we rely on grassy swales, grease traps and detention basins to protect the pristine public wetland that is destined to receive the results? It won't work.
Therefore, the public needs a thorough assessment of the receiving area as a baseline for evaluating future damages. Wiping out the shrimp could initiate a cascading failure of the food chain, resulting in significant natural resource damages. The City and Developer would be liable for these damages for having permitted the development with inadequate mitigation. I believe that adequate mitigation is impossible and that irreparable damage is inevitable. I, for one, intend to file a natural resources damage claim when they occur. The success of such an effort depends upon a complete and current assessment. It is the City's duty to protect the public's interest. Please do so.
However, the best possible mitigation for the project would be to review the zoning error that created this environmental catastrophe. Without going into excruciating detail on the numerous things the City did, but should not have, or didn't do, but should have, that have kept this project alive, it is worth outlining several points of illegitimacy that this project relies upon:
- The only rationale of record for the rezone appears in a 1979 presentation by then City Planner Rick Fackler, who stated that the bridge over Padden Creek would require replacement within “the next few years” if Chuckanut was not connected to Old Fairhaven Parkway (then Valley Parkway) through the project AND that zoning density sufficient to support the improvement through the subject property was necessary.
o This was an erroneous assertion. The connector was not built and the bridge did not require replacement.
o Density to make the property economically feasible for development is not a legitimate basis for zoning.
o The prerequisite conditions of a connector or bridge widening is not being met by the proposal, yet the density remains.
- There was never a public hearing specific to the zoning change before either the Planning Commission or the City Council.
- The zoning change was never advertised and affected property owners were never notified.
- The zoning change furthered none and contravened most of the adopted policies, goals and objectives in the South Neighborhood Plan. Many citywide policies, goals and objectives were and are similarly disregarded.
- The zoning change was adopted as part of the “whole cloth” of the original Bellingham Comprehensive Plan, in an unusual council action, and was hence generally unknown to citizens until the project was originally proposed in 1996.
- The resulting public furor prompted an exhaustive document review by then city planner Chris Spens, whose conclusion, “It’s a mystery at best”, was published in the Final Draft EIS for the original proposal.
o The City then had a duty to review this as a possible zoning error, but never did.
- The zoning change was supposedly legitimized by subsequent re-adoptions of the Comprehensive Plan, but has never been specifically reviewed for consistency with neighborhood or City goals.
- The zoning was administratively re-adjusted by mayoral memorandum involving a conveyance/reconveyance scheme that parceled out a major wetland and qualified the owner for a substantial tax benefit.
o The public was afforded no opportunity for input and no comprehensive review was conducted.
o The Growth Management Hearings Board has determined that this methodology constitutes an illegal development regulation and has overturned similar "deals".
- The City delayed adoption of new critical areas provisions beyond multiple deadlines and under threat of state sanctions until the project could be supposedly “vested”. Whether or not vesting has been actually achieved is subject to debate.
- The City downgraded expectations of traffic performance in the project vicinity to Level of Service "F", or gridlock, to circumvent the state Growth management requirement for traffic infrastructure "concurrency", saving the proponents millions.
- The project received a miraculous four-day Determination of Completeness, even though prerequisite conditions were not met, regulatory buffers were slighted and buildings were placed on known landslide scarps, designated steep slopes and sensitive areas.
o The most previous City Determination of Completeness was for a 350 square foot addition to an existing South Hill home and required nearly six months.
- Since the zoning was mysteriously “adopted”, changes in perspective on planning and environmental protection principles have made the designation appear less, not more, appropriate.
Altogether, sustaining this project has involved way too many miracles or mysteries. It is either a tragic comedy of errors, incompetent or inept planning, or much worse - a corrupt collusion of favoritism toward special interests. Informants, commenting confidentially, have asserted that elected officials of the time had a financial interest in the property, held under a blind Delaware Corporation located in Lynden. Only a subpoena can discover the veracity of the assertion. It definitely deserves an investigation.
However the City can and should overturn the Determination of Completeness and review the zoning error. Were the City to review the zoning error and designate land uses consistent with the long-adopted South Neighborhood and City policies, citizens would then have a chance to acquire the property at a realistic price. Festooned with the absurd prospect of 739 residential units, project proponents can't see the forest for the glitter of imaginary gold. That's not community spirit.
The real tragedy is that development of the property will forever foreclose the opportunity to extend Fairhaven Park to meet the City's own standard for the population they have targeted for the area. It will eliminate the chance to connect Fairhaven Park to our substantial Interurban corridor investments, leveraging their value and creating a "Gateway to the Chuckanuts". This is a once in a lifetime chance at an opportunity of regional importance. Don't miss it.
See you there!
Related Links:
-> See the tiny freshwater shrimp video
Comments (2)
To add a comment, click here to login or register.
Larry Horowitz // Wed, Jan 16, 2008, 6:13 pm
Tip,
I agree with your assessment of the Chuckanut Ridge fiasco, and I wanted to elaborate on two remedies we have now to deal with both the zoning and vesting issues.
Zoning:
In 1980, the city provided the former Chuckanut Ridge landowners with a density consideration that increased their potential housing yield by more than 600%. In exchange for this density consideration, the developer was required to build a connector road (from Chuckanut Drive to Old Fairhaven Pkwy) or widen the Fairhaven/12th St Bridge over Padden Creek.
The Horizon Bank/Edelstein submittal in 2005 ignores this requirement. Unless they abide by the prerequisite conditions, the density consideration provided in exchange for these conditions should be removed.
Vesting:
The ?Vested Rights Doctrine? in Washington state (Noble Manor v Pierce County) establishes two requirements for a permit application to be vested:
1) The application must be substantially complete; and
2) The application must comply with existing zoning ordinances and building codes in effect at the time the application is submitted.
Although the ?Notice of Completeness? issued by the city claims that the application meets the first requirement, it is silent on the second. It cannot be presumed that the Fairhaven Highlands application is vested. In fact, this application violates at least two zoning ordinances in effect at the time:
1) The prerequisite conditions in the South Neighborhood Table of Zoning Regulations for Area 4, discussed above; and
2) The 100? wetland buffer requirements for the five Category 1, mature forested wetlands on the Chuckanut Ridge site. (Note that the Fairhaven Highlands application calls for only 50? buffers for these wetlands.)
Failing to meet the standards established by the Vested Rights Doctrine, the application is not vested and must now comply with the 2005 Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO), which requires a minimum of 150? buffers for the Category 1, mature forested wetlands.
You would think that a community bank would have the desire to meet these requirement that we established more than two years ago. Perhaps Horizon is not as community minded as they would like us to think.
Hopefully the city will understand these facts and act accordingly. I am more hopeful that they will under Mayor Dan Pike?s leadership.
g.h. kirsch // Wed, Jan 16, 2008, 6:56 pm
I have not studied this issue much, but am glad that you all have finally struck on some good legal challenges that should be more compelling than the largely aesthetic and provincial ones that have gotten most of our attention. Good luck.
Skip the Fireworks - Send Money to Support Our Troops
Mon, May 20, 2013, 11:48 am // Dick Conoboy
You can give your money, normally dished out to fireworks manufacturers and distributors, to organizations that help our disabled veterans. Change the way we celebrate Independence Day.0 comments
Who is filing for elective offices???
Fri, May 17, 2013, 4:44 pm // John Servais
Tuesday morning and nothing in today's Bellingham Herald. Nor online. We provide the basics to fill in this latest omission by our "daily" newspaper.
6 comments; last on May 20, 2013
Village Books
The Myth of Waterfront Public Process
Thu, May 16, 2013, 11:55 am // Wendy Harris
The public process on the revised waterfront plans is an empty charade1 comments; last on May 17, 2013
Watch What You Say, Bellingham
Wed, May 15, 2013, 10:23 pm // Wendy Harris
The political censor police are listening to you5 comments; last on May 16, 2013
University Ridge Dormitory, The Infill Tool Kit and Our Neighborhoods
Mon, May 13, 2013, 2:50 am // Dick Conoboy
Some very important issues with respect to the University Ridge private dormitory project in the Puget Neighborhood will not be considered in the approval process.6 comments; last on May 17, 2013
Notes From The City Planning Commission Meeting
Fri, May 10, 2013, 9:22 am // Wendy Harris
The City Planning Commission Advocates "Free Market Capitalism" Approach to Waterfront Planning.1 comments; last on May 12, 2013
Silver Lake Geese Remain At Risk
Thu, May 09, 2013, 11:07 pm // Wendy Harris
A recent letter by the Parks Department fails to contain reassurance that the geese will be safe from extermination this year.0 comments
Update on University Ridge Student Dormitory Development
Wed, May 08, 2013, 8:53 am // Dick Conoboy
Ambling University Development has proposed building private, off-campus dormitory buildings in the Puget Neighborhood. Their revised proposal was submitted on 29 April.
0 comments
In Memory of Paul deArmond
Mon, May 06, 2013, 1:40 am // Guest writer
Paul deArmond is remembered by his sister Claire. He was a Republican-at-Large.
2 comments; last on May 08, 2013
Coal Trains and Unhealthy Air - Any Connection?
Sun, May 05, 2013, 2:45 pm // John Servais
Help fund a scientific study looking for links between diesel locomotives, coal trains and unhealthy air.0 comments
Help Save Larrabee Elementary School
Sat, May 04, 2013, 12:09 pm // Guest writer
Wendy Scherrer reminds all who support modest sized grade schools to try and attend the meeting Wed, May 8, in the evening.3 comments; last on May 10, 2013
Herding Dogs May Be Too Late To Save Silver Lake Geese
Fri, May 03, 2013, 10:16 pm // Wendy Harris
The Humane Society is bringing herding dogs to control Silver Lake geese, but it is not an optimal situation for success.0 comments
Questioning County Park Funding Priorities
Wed, May 01, 2013, 10:31 pm // Wendy Harris
The County Parks Department has allocated funding for playground equipment, but has not allocated funding for wildlife management planning.1 comments; last on May 03, 2013
Krugman Spells It Out In Plain English
Sun, Apr 28, 2013, 9:30 pm // John Servais
New York Times columnist, Paul Krugman, has a masterful short article that explains why austerity is not working.2 comments; last on May 02, 2013
County Parks Department Releases “National Enquirer” Style Memo On Geese
Wed, Apr 24, 2013, 6:05 pm // Wendy Harris
The only urgency underscored by the Silver Lake geese is the urgency of enacting a comprehensive wildlife strategy.4 comments; last on Apr 29, 2013
Cascadia Weekly Tribute to Paul de Armond
Wed, Apr 24, 2013, 10:58 am // John Servais
The Gristle in today's Cascadia Weekly is devoted to a tribute to Paul de Armond. Tim Johnson gets it right.0 comments
Freedom Academy Comes to Whatcom County
Mon, Apr 22, 2013, 5:52 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley attends Tea Party training and runs afoul of Rep. Overstreet
1 comments; last on Apr 22, 2013
Paul de Armond has passed away
Sun, Apr 21, 2013, 12:59 pm // John Servais
Well known political writer has died.
5 comments; last on Apr 23, 2013
ACTION ALERT: Death Sentence Hangs Over Silver Lake Geese
Sat, Apr 20, 2013, 10:52 am // Wendy Harris
There will be no due process for the Canada geese, or the public, before the County Parks Department lethally removes the geese from Silver Lake4 comments; last on Apr 24, 2013
Who’s Selling Who Down What River
Sat, Apr 13, 2013, 8:19 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein we see how the Ds do the work the Rs can't get away with7 comments; last on Apr 17, 2013
The Waterfront Will Be Safe. Trust Me!
Sat, Apr 13, 2013, 2:47 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein the people who call capping a clean-up say toxics safe enough for day care.1 comments; last on Apr 25, 2013
Waterfront Plans Fail to Protect Historic Buildings
Wed, Apr 10, 2013, 10:24 pm // Wendy Harris
The Waterfront District Sub-Area Plan needs policies that favor adaptive reuse and preservation of historic waterfront structures0 comments
Notice of Defect
Mon, Apr 08, 2013, 11:56 am // Tip Johnson
Wherein we complain about the City and Port stealing from the public6 comments; last on Apr 13, 2013
Status of the Move to Ban Fireworks in Bellingham
Sat, Apr 06, 2013, 2:59 pm // Dick Conoboy
Dangerous fireworks likely to continue being sold in Bellingham for this 4th of July
1 comments; last on Apr 06, 2013
City Proposes New Economic Development Policy
Sat, Apr 06, 2013, 1:06 pm // Wendy Harris
The city's proposed new Economic Development Chapter is based on an outdated economic theory1 comments; last on Apr 06, 2013
County Slaughterhouse Rezone: Dumb and Dumber
Fri, Apr 05, 2013, 3:59 pm // Wendy Harris
New slaughterhouse proposal "wishes away" current agricultural zoning restrictions.10 comments; last on Apr 21, 2013
Is That Apple Hard Drive Really Yours?
Thu, Apr 04, 2013, 11:48 am // Dick Conoboy
It seems that for Apple products, you do not really own that hard drive... as a journalist recently discovered.
2 comments; last on Apr 13, 2013
The GPT Scoping Summary Report Released
Mon, Apr 01, 2013, 3:00 pm // Wendy Harris
Government agencies responsible for the GPT project have completed review of the scoping comments.0 comments
Coming Soon to the Waterfront: More Dioxin and Toxic Waste
Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 9:36 pm // Wendy Harris
A beneficial reuse provision in the Waterfront District Sub-Area Plan would allow construction materials that are contaminated with bioaccumulative toxins.0 comments
Waterfront “Planned Action Ordinance” Limits Restoration and Public Input
Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 8:59 pm // Wendy Harris
The City Planning Department has included a technical document in the waterfront proposal without disclosing important impacts.1 comments; last on Mar 30, 2013
Read All About It! Cattlemen want slaughter.
Sun, Mar 24, 2013, 3:01 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein the Cattlemen define 'small scale' as an unlimited number of facilities of up to 50 million live pounds per year.3 comments; last on Mar 26, 2013
Living Wage and Working Waterfront 101
Sat, Mar 23, 2013, 10:53 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein the rate base gets a soaking while officials keep big-bubble toking7 comments; last on Apr 08, 2013
No City Housing Hearing on March 20
Tue, Mar 19, 2013, 9:05 am // John Servais
The Bellingham Herald article today is wrong. There is no hearing tomorrow, March 200 comments
Valuable Article in the Whatcom Watch
Sun, Mar 17, 2013, 8:42 pm // John Servais
Wendy Harris writes about the proposed $8 million concrete bridge along the Bellingham waterfront - using Greenways funds to build.
3 comments; last on Mar 20, 2013
University Ridge Height Variance Hearing Postponed
Tue, Mar 12, 2013, 10:50 am // Dick Conoboy
Several complaints to the city seem to have occasioned a postponement of a height variance hearing until a complete development proposal is submitted.1 comments; last on Mar 12, 2013
Closing Arguments in Defense of the Reconveyance
Mon, Mar 11, 2013, 6:37 am // Guest writer
Guest writer Shane Roth writes in favor of the reconveyance of Lake Whatcom land back to the county.1 comments; last on Mar 11, 2013
Again, we must “vote for the forest”.........or should we?
Fri, Mar 08, 2013, 12:54 am // Guest writer
Delaine Clizbe guest writes. Whatcom County has 7,100 acres of park land, with 1,900 acres actually developed. Yet we keep adding land, and not developing our parks.
16 comments; last on Mar 12, 2013
Obamacare and the Coming (Not Again?) Wealth Transfer
Wed, Mar 06, 2013, 10:05 am // Dick Conoboy
You are not likely to escape the coming transfer of $billions from your pocket to the health insurance industry. You will get little, if anything, in return.
4 comments; last on Apr 05, 2013
Legislation and Sausage
Tue, Mar 05, 2013, 3:20 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein it's even worse when the legislation is about sausage0 comments
Support our Troops - Ban Fireworks
Sun, Mar 03, 2013, 4:17 pm // Dick Conoboy
Do we need to recreate the sounds and sights of the battlefield when doing so brings pain and suffering to our combat veterans?
0 comments
Marine Sanctuary Standards
Sat, Mar 02, 2013, 8:03 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein the ironies of life are explored and the necessities of life are contemplated2 comments; last on Mar 12, 2013
Troubling Implications of Variance Request
Fri, Mar 01, 2013, 4:19 pm // Wendy Harris
A variance request pending before the City could create a loophole for developers seeking to avoid compliance with development standards.5 comments; last on Mar 07, 2013
PeaceHealth Merger Threatens Women’s Health in Whatcom County
Tue, Feb 26, 2013, 6:39 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley details upcoming merger between PeaceHealth and a much more conservative entity
1 comments; last on Feb 26, 2013
University Ridge Student Housing - What is it?
Mon, Feb 25, 2013, 6:54 pm // Dick Conoboy
There is a private sector development proposal to house approximately 600 students in the Puget Neighborhood on 11 acres to the east of Nevada St.
5 comments; last on Feb 27, 2013
Petition to Establish a Bellingham Art Market
Mon, Feb 25, 2013, 5:51 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein artists have to eat, too!
0 comments
Senator Ericksen Displays His Colors
Fri, Feb 22, 2013, 3:01 pm // John Servais
Riley Sweeney has posted a great video clip of Sen. Doug Ericksen flouting rules and legal procedures at a Senate hearing in Olympia.0 comments
City Controls Chuckanut Park - Not New Park District
Fri, Feb 22, 2013, 2:47 pm // John Servais
The election created a new park district with taxing power - but with NO control over Chuckanut Ridge - the 100 acre woods.1 comments; last on Feb 23, 2013
Waterfront EIS Revised Without Public Process
Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 9:40 pm // Wendy Harris
An "Updated Preferred Alternative" reduces the number of waterfront jobs and expands the boundary of the waterfront district.
0 comments
Slaughtering the County Tax Base
Fri, Feb 15, 2013, 12:20 am // Tip Johnson
Wherein the Slaughterhouse Ken and Barbie show present Slaughterville, their new vision for Whatcom County9 comments; last on Feb 19, 2013
Thoughts on the Park District Vote
Wed, Feb 13, 2013, 3:42 pm // John Servais
The Park District vote is close and we will not know final results until late ballots are counted.6 comments; last on Feb 19, 2013
Public Hearing on New Bellingham Economic Development Policy
Wed, Feb 13, 2013, 2:59 pm // Wendy Harris
Participate in the public process by commenting on the new Economic Development chapter to the city comprehensive plan1 comments; last on Feb 15, 2013
Time to Vote on Park District
Sat, Feb 09, 2013, 12:14 am // John Servais
The proponents have avoided the issues on the Park District as the close of voting nears this weekend.2 comments; last on Feb 12, 2013
Check the Protect Bellingham Parks Website
Wed, Feb 06, 2013, 10:42 pm // John Servais
When is a vote No the most positive and common sense action? Check the park district opponents website to learn why.15 comments; last on Feb 10, 2013
Ironies With the Park District
Tue, Feb 05, 2013, 12:59 pm // John Servais
This Park District proposal has several ironic twists and facets - some involving the advocates.
10 comments; last on Feb 07, 2013
The Big Picture on Chuckanut Ridge
Sun, Feb 03, 2013, 3:05 pm // Guest writer
Nicholas Zaferatos explains why he is concerned about the park district and looks at the long and short term views if the issue.11 comments; last on Feb 06, 2013
A note from the publisher
Sat, Feb 02, 2013, 11:18 am // John Servais
The Chuckanut Park District ballot issue has another 10 days to run. A few notes about NWCitizen and this issue.11 comments; last on Feb 05, 2013
Chuckanut Mountains and the Park District
Fri, Feb 01, 2013, 3:16 pm // Guest writer
Dr. Gibb explains some history to the issue in a brief article.8 comments; last on Feb 03, 2013
Former Park Directors Against Park District Proposal
Thu, Jan 31, 2013, 12:36 pm // Guest writer
Paul Leuthold and Byron Elmendorf explain why to vote NO on the Chuckanut Park District ballot measure.19 comments; last on Feb 12, 2013
It Is Not a Vote to Save The Forest
Thu, Jan 31, 2013, 12:26 am // Guest writer
Guest post by long time south side resident Marci (Hanson) Haskell on why to vote no on the Park District5 comments; last on Feb 01, 2013
Why I am voting NO on the Park Disttict
Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 9:40 am // John Servais
The Park District is a panic action that over taxes a small group. A city wide solution is by far the better way to proceed.13 comments; last on Jan 31, 2013
New Links
Reconveyance ChallengeSalish Sea Org.
the Oatmeal
Current Interest
Community Wise BellinghamFriends of Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections
Publisher Recommended
GlobalPostLeague of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics
the Oatmeal
Local Blogs & News
Bellingham HeraldBham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch
Local Causes
Bellingham Police ActivityChuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Governments
BellinghamPort of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections
Weather & Climate
Cliff Mass Weather BlogClimate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Leisure
Adventures NWEdge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy
Good Links
Al-Jazeera onlineAlaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com
NwCitizen 1995 - 2007
Early Northwest CitizenInternet At Its Best
TEDQuiet, Offline or Dead
Bellingham RegisterCarl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers