Open letter to Bellingham Planning Director Jeff Thomas re: Fairhaven Highlands application deadline

Permalink +

Sun, Oct 31, 2010, 6:20 pm  //  Larry Horowitz

Update Oct 31:

Upon further review of the correspondence between the applicant’s attorney and Interim Planning Director Jeff Thomas, it’s not clear whether there has been any meeting of the minds.

In the attorney’s Oct 28 letter, he observes that the revised estimate for the EIS of $345,000 substantially exceeds the initial contract amount of $75,000.  I agree.  But is anyone really surprised by the cost overrun?

When the city went out to bid back in 2007, five consulting firms submitted proposals, which ranged from an estimate of 489 hours (ESA Adolfson) to 2,082 hours (Wheeler Consulting Group).  ESA Adolfson was the consultant hand-picked and recommended by the developer.  Wheeler was a primary author of the 1995 Chuckanut Ridge EIS and was very familiar with the property. 

It was obvious to everyone that ESA’s bid, which was less than one-fourth of Wheeler’s, was insufficient.  As it turns out, the final estimate of $345,000 is about 4 ½ times the initial estimate, or roughly what Wheeler proposed.  Why is anyone surprised that ESA’s estimate was way too low?  And how can the developer complain now when the city selected the developer’s hand-picked consultant?

The attorney goes on to assert the applicant’s right to seek mediation or other informal alternative dispute resolution if the applicant does not agree to the projected, additional expenses to complete the EIS.  So, the applicant “sets aside” its request for an extension only to implement an alternate delay tactic.  The attorney has asked the city to compile time and expense records, a task estimated to take at least 30 days.  Then, after that’s complete, the applicant will likely seek mediation to delay the process further.  An obvious stall tactic.

Finally, the attorney indicates that the applicant may “wish to revisit ‘suspension’ of these processes” at some point in the future.  WTF?

In Mr. Thomas’ Oct 29 letter, he enumerates the terms of this new “agreement” with clear deadlines for items 1-3 and a vague, unenforceable provision for item 4.  He also states that the city does not agree to any future “suspension” of the EIS process (nice work, Jeff).

Finally, in the attorney’s Oct 29 letter, he states that the applicant, Greenbriar NW Associates, “does object to the proposed contract revision” and wishes “to exercise its contractual rights of review and negotiation.”

And so the stall begins.  Who needs an extension when you can game the system so easily?

- Has there been any meeting of the minds? 

- Is the EIS process moving forward? 

- Has the applicant violated the city’s 120-day deadline? 

- Are these applications now null and void?

Who knows?

_________________________________________________

 

Update Oct 29, 6:00 pm:

This afternoon, the City of Bellingham posted two additional letters from the applicant’s attorney and one letter from the Interim Planning Director Jeff Thomas, as follows:
Letter from Langabeer & Tull to Jeff Thomas dated Oct 28 (here)
Letter from Langabeer & Tull to Jeff Thomas dated Oct 29 (here)
Letter from Jeff Thomas to Langabeer & Tull dated Oct 29 (here)
Based on my (very brief) initial review of these letters, it appears that the developers have “set aside” (read withdrawn) their extension request and are now willing to re-start the SEPA and environmental impact statement (EIS) process based on the following terms, as listed in Jeff Thomas’ Oct 29 letter:
1. The developers will pay $9,221.38 by Nov 5 for work already completed by the EIS consultant, ESA Adolfson.
2. The city will compile all time & billing records for work completed on the EIS by the city and by ESA and forward to the developers by Nov 30.
3. The city will propose changes to the original EIS agreement, including a detailed scope of work for the additional $107,802, and forward to the developer by Nov 30.
4. The developer must then “commence good faith negotiations in a timely manner to amend the Agreement” or the applications will become “null and void.”
My take: Although the first three requirements are clear enough to determine if they have been satisfied, the fourth item is so vague that compliance will be difficult – if not impossible - to determine.  Such vague terms as “good faith negotiations” and "timely manner” provide too much flexibility to be strictly enforced.  Once again, the city seems to have placed itself in a position that it will not be able to enforce its own laws. 
It is essential that a time limit be established following the Nov 30 deadline for items 2 and 3 so that enforcement is possible on item 4.  For example, item 4 could state that the amendment must be signed and the $107,802 balance paid within 14 days of items 2 and 3 being satisfied.  Further, the applicant's responses to comments on the Draft EIS must be received within 30 days after the amended agreement has been signed.
Failure to establish enforceable provisions will allow the developer to drag out the process as it has already done for more than five years.  The city attorney needs to modify these terms ASAP.
________________________
Update: Oct 29, 10:00 am:
I just spoke with Jeff Thomas’ assistant who stated she is not aware of any final decision being made on the extension request.
Regarding the assertion by the applicant’s attorney that the city cannot deny the extension request because of the “clear prohibitions … against governmental bodies using their police power jurisdiction to reduce the value…”  I have posted David Bricklin’s response here.  As Mr. Bricklin states, “Mr. Tull is guilty of mis-leading you with a statement that is only half true and which is totally inapplicable here.”
______________________
 
Original Post: Thur, Oct 28, 10:30 am
 
Dear Mr. Thomas:
 
As you know, BMC 21.10.190.C is the City of Bellingham’s law as it applies to the expiration of development applications.  It states:
 
“Any complete land use application for which no substantial steps have been taken to respond to the City's request for revisions, corrections or additional information within 120 days of the written determination will expire and become null and void.”
 
In other words, the city has a standard 120-day deadline for applicant’s to respond to the city’s request for information.  Only by exception is the 120-day deadline extended.
 
Due to the applicant’s failure to respond, the Fairhaven Highlands application was set to expire on April 30, 2010.  It was extended and was set to expire on July 30.  It was extended again and is now set to expire on October 29.
 
In his October 12 letter to you, the applicant’s attorney asserts that the city’s desire to enforce its own application expiration law is a form of “pushback” from your department.  As a citizen whose rights are upheld by city laws, I am offended by this assertion.  As anyone who has followed this application knows, the city has bent over backwards to accommodate the applicant.  
 
In his letter, the applicant’s attorney also asserts that a recent city ordinance “explicitly recognizes an applicant’s right to request a project extension in the event of economic hardship, which is certainly the case here.”
 
First, the attorney is referring to Ordinance 2010-05-026 and BMC 21.10.260.D.  As you know, this ordinance and code section only apply to “issued land use approvals,” not to land use applications.  Since there are no land use approvals associated with the Fairhaven Highlands applications, the attorney’s reference is not valid.  Further, the attorney’s inference that Fairhaven Highlands is “a project not subject to any deadline” simply ignores BMC 21.10.190.C, which establishes a clear deadline to prevent an application from expiring.
 
Second, this ordinance and code section require the applicant to submit a “sworn declaration” that the delay is “a result of an inability to secure financing.”  As you know, one of the property owners is among the 80 largest banks in the United States with assets in excess of $13 billion.  It is simply not fathomable that the applicant is unable to secure financing.  Again, the attorney’s reference to this ordinance is not valid.
 
The applicant’s attorney also asserts that “the only aspect of this project that has any time sensitivity is the informational staleness.”  Again, untrue.  As the attorney knows, the only reason the applicant continues to request extensions is to preserve its “presumed” ability to circumvent the 2005 Bellingham Critical Areas Ordinance.  As a homeowner who is extremely concerned about the safety risks imposed by the Fairhaven Highlands application - including “injury, loss of life, or property damage due to landslides and steep slope failures, erosion, seismic events, or flooding” – I am appalled that city would even consider such a circumvention of a public safety ordinance.  Clearly, the applicant’s attorney is being less than honest with you.
 
Finally, the applicant’s attorney seems to imply that denial of the extension request would amount to a “police power jurisdiction to reduce the value” of the land.  Again, I am offended.  Mayor Pike has made it clear that your determination is completely separate from any potential land acquisitions by the city.  Such an implied accusation by the applicant’s attorney is both offensive and without merit.  Bully tactics such as these should not be catered to.
 
I join with thousands of residents in south Bellingham and request that the applicant’s extension request be denied.  The applicant’s “critical issues” which prevent it from moving forward provide no justifiable reason for yet another extension.  

Ham Hayes  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 9:53 am

Larry, as usual your article is well researched and articulated. 

I would hope that Bellingham city officials show some transparency by providing a timely response to your letter.  Please keep us apprised!

Ham


Sheri Ward  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 12:11 pm

Larry,

Thanks for the well-researched article.  I agree the extension is unwarranted. 

Aside from this immediate decision, the city owes its citizens a thorough review of the zoning for this parcel, which in the opinion of many is total inappropriate.  When we first moved to town in 1985, we could not fathom why such a steep and environmentally important piece of land would be zoned for high density development.  Add to that, its inaccessibility if the 12th Street bridge were to be blocked for some long or short span of time, the current zoning simply doesn’t make any sense. 

Our city administrators and elected officials can make this right if they so choose.  Let’s hope they do.


Vince Biciunas  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 12:14 pm

Thank you Larry for an excellent letter to Acting Planning Director Jeff Thomas.

I agree with every point you have made and plan to send that message directly to Mr Thomas today.

There is no defensible reason for a third extension to this application.


Daniel Warner  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 12:46 pm

Larry, thanks for your continued work on this project.

Eben Fodor observes in his book “Better, Not Bigger” that planners support the growth machine:

“Support for the growth machine often comes from professionals whose jobs are directly connect with growth. . . .The business of planning has become primarily the process of accommodating growth.  With out growth, the role of the urban planner would need to be greatly refined.  When planners are called upon to evaluate growth management policies, it?s not surprising tat they are often less than enthusiastic about policies that might actually slow or stop growth.?

It wasn?t always so.  During the 1960s and 1970s a rich theoretical literature grew up featuring a serious critique of planning and the profession.  In part this took the form of increasing citizens? involvement in planning decisions.  A loose coalition of essentially liberal-minded planners rallied under the banner of a choice theory of planning, emphasizing citizen choice in, and even determination of, planning decisions.  The rise of Reaganism and Thatcherism, among other trends, soon caused a retreat from the ?radical? idea that planning should emphasize citizens? choice.  Planners soon returned to ?disciplinary traditions? with ?direct attacks on social theories that are perceived as harming the professional credibility of planning, and a renewed emphasis on public-private partnerships in the development process? (Michael J. Dear, The Postmodern Urban Condition, p. 122).  The planners? role is to assist government in the administration of ?government intervention in the private land-development process? (id., at 123).

And Wendell Berry writes: ?That human limitedlessness is a fantasy means, obviously, that its life expectancy is limited.  There is now a growing perception, and not just among a few experts, that we are entering a time of inescapable limits.  We are not likely to be granted another world to plunder in compensation for our pillage of this one.?

Thanks again for your comments Larry, and thanks John S. for your work on this blog.

Dan Warner


Larry Horowitz  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 1:12 pm

Some might be wondering why I waited until Oct 27 to respond to the Oct 12 letter from the developer?s attorney, especially in light of the Oct 29 deadline. 

The answer is actually quite simple.  Those of us who contacted the planning dept were told ? incorrectly it turns out - that the city had not received any letters from the developers or their attorney.  Even when I called on Oct 25, I was told that the city had not received any letters.

None of us had any clue the city had received the Oct 12 letter until it was placed on the city?s website on the afternoon of Oct 26.

How’s that for transparency, Ham?


Ham Hayes  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 2:07 pm

Methinks our governments think we work for them, rather than the opposite case. 

The unwillingness or inability of our government to respond in even a nominal way to legitimate concerns is what drives the current anti-incumbent mood of our country.

From Plato, “Excess generally causes reaction, and produces a change in the opposite direction, whether it be in the seasons, or in individuals, or in governments.” In this case, either excess secrecy or excess incompetence…or perhaps a bit of both.


Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 2:31 pm

Larry,

Thomas asked that Tull and his client provide further detail on the “crucial issues” facing the project by October 22nd.  Have you seen the response?

Besides objecting to the project’s reliance on archaic critical areas regulations, I agree with Vince Biciunas that it is past time to review the phony zoning.

The DEIS adequately demonstrated that even half of the zoned density cannot be built without unacceptable adverse consequences to public health and the environment.

A normal zoning review was never done.  A former top City planner once described the assignment of the land use designation as “a mystery at best”.  The project furthers not one neighborhood goal or objective, instead hampering many.

It is clear from the record, or lack thereof, that this zoning was implemented specifically to make development of the property feasible in view of prerequisite conditions considered imperative at the time. That is not a legitimate basis for zoning. The project’s failure to contemplate these prerequisite conditions further argues for a review of the zoning and necessary conditions.

Beyond that, the City’s miraculous and erroneous Determination of Completeness, upon which this projects “vesting” rests, should be reviewed and the citizen appeal processed.

It is time for City planners to do their job:

1) Retroactively review the project’s Determination of Completeness and process the citizen appeal,
2) Insist on current development regulations,
3) Assure that zoning is rationally derived, not invented to benefit a single landowner at tremendous cost to the community, and
4) In the interest of regulatory consistency, adopt a policy that no project may be extended unless it meets all current development regulations.


Larry Horowitz  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 3:07 pm

Tip,

The only response to Jeff Thomas? request for more information that I have seen is the attorney?s Oct 22 letter in which he states that he is ?working on providing additional information and will be in touch early in the week.?

I just spoke with Jeff Thomas who stated that as of 12:30 today he had not received any additional information.  He was on his way to check today?s incoming mail.

Here?s a link to Oct 22 letter:
+ Link info/eis-correspondence/2010-10-22-tull-ltr-to-thomas.pdf


Larry Horowitz  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 3:48 pm

BREAKING!

I?m sorry to report that it appears the city is too afraid to enforce its own application extension law and will ONCE AGAIN approve another 120-day extension.  Veiled threats of a lawsuit seem to have made the difference.

Pitchforks, anyone?


Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 3:52 pm

Seems to me that “on or before October 22nd” was pretty clear and Tull definitely missed it.  That should kill the extension, shouldn’t it?


Larry Horowitz  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 4:22 pm

That would presume that the public?s business is being handled in public.  The attorney has personally visited with Mr. Thomas on more than one occasion.  There is no paper trail of these meetings, so no one knows what?s being discussed.  When I asked for meeting notes, I was told, ?We generally don?t take notes at these meetings.?

Sounds very ?Mission Impossible? to me.  Perhaps they have recordings that self-destruct?


Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 4:31 pm

This continues the City’s pattern of not doing what it is supposed to do whenever it might interfere with this project and doing things it shouldn’t if it might help.

Planning of by and for the developers?


Water, Water Everywhere, but ...

Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 1:57 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

or How Not to Plan for Future Generations' Water Needs

3 comments; last on Apr 20, 2014

Charter Review and District Only Voting

Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 9:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting

0 comments

Paper Dreams in Fairhaven

Next door to Village Books

Roosevelt Neighborhood Pleads for Left Turns

Wed, Apr 09, 2014, 8:07 am  //  Riley Sweeney

City pushes for Alabama Street improvements, residents speak out

3 comments; last on Apr 14, 2014

Assault

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 3:29 pm  //  Guest writer

By Christopher Grannis: Wherein despite every effort and expense, citizens cannot make the City follow the law or work for neighborhoods

2 comments; last on Apr 07, 2014

Killer Industrial Jobs or Long-term Job Killers?

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 11:52 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Why commenting on the EIS in Comp Plan revisions for Cherry Point means demanding an EIS in the first place.

4 comments; last on Apr 13, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XII - Citizens Win Against University Ridge

Wed, Apr 02, 2014, 5:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling University Development Group pulls out. University Ridge will not be built.

12 comments; last on Apr 06, 2014

Tell County To Expand Scope of EIS Review for Plants and Animals

Tue, Apr 01, 2014, 12:27 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Please help us protect county wildlife by ensuring that the scope of the EIS review is adequate. A sample scoping letter is included.

0 comments

Public May Comment On EIS Scoping For County Comp. Plan Until April 7th

Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 1:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public has a week to comment on the scope of issues reviewed under the EIS.

0 comments

My State of the Lake Report for 2014

Fri, Mar 28, 2014, 12:32 am  //  Wendy Harris

On March 26, 2014 the city and county provided their update and assessment on the status of Lake Whatcom. This is mine.

2 comments; last on Apr 01, 2014

County Considers Purchasing Toxic Property

Wed, Mar 19, 2014, 9:32 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into the county's plan to buy the county morgue

3 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Propaganda Replaces Public Information:  An Analysis of the Lake Whatcom TDML Process

Sun, Mar 16, 2014, 11:52 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The public is not provided with a proposed plan or adequate information prior to the annual "state of the lake" meeting

4 comments; last on Mar 18, 2014

Mobile Slaughter

Sat, Mar 15, 2014, 12:11 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein there's a crackdown on growing plants, and plans to let slaughter run free

2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2014

Fukushima Radiation Found In Canada

Fri, Mar 14, 2014, 9:47 am  //  John Servais

Fukushima radiation has been found 20 miles from Whatcom County farmland along the Fraser River in British Columbia.

1 comments; last on Mar 17, 2014

Is ALEC Jr. Coming to Whatcom County or Bellingham Soon?

Wed, Mar 12, 2014, 7:28 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The infamous American Legislative Exchange Council plans to send its spawn to cities and counties throughout the U.S.

1 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Rep. Vincent Buys Appears to Break State Fundraising Laws

Tue, Mar 11, 2014, 10:24 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley catches State Rep. Vincent Buys for soliciting funds during session

0 comments

County Hires GPT Permit Lead as Senior Planner

Mon, Mar 10, 2014, 9:51 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into an unusual hiring decision at the County Planning Dept

1 comments; last on Mar 10, 2014

Whatcom Watch Editor Resigns

Sun, Mar 02, 2014, 2:22 pm  //  John Servais

The editor of the Whatcom Watch, Richard Jehn, has resigned effective today. Chalk up a victory for Craig Cole and Pacific International Terminals.

8 comments; last on Mar 05, 2014

Relevant Documents to Libel Threat

Tue, Feb 25, 2014, 8:29 pm  //  John Servais

The full text of Craig Cole's threatening letter of libel against the Whatcom Watch. And the emptiness of the threat.

16 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Not Being Protected as Promised

Mon, Feb 24, 2014, 3:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

We were led to believe the city would review waterfront wildlife and habitat connectivity. It turns out that the city intends to focus only on nearshore fish.

0 comments

Wendy Harris on Citizen Journalism

Sat, Feb 22, 2014, 12:16 am  //  Wendy Harris

Accepting the Paul deArmond award of citizen journalism on Feb 7, Wendh Harris gave this speech. We think it deserves its own post.

0 comments

Craig Cole Threatens Libel Suit

Wed, Feb 19, 2014, 4:48 pm  //  John Servais

Craig Cole, the local contact for the proposed Cherry Point coal port has threatened the Whatcom Watch with a libel lawsuit.

6 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Do Changing Liquor and Marijuana Laws Affect DUIs

Mon, Feb 17, 2014, 7:26 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs through court data and discovers the real impact of privatization and legalization

0 comments

Bellingham Seeks “Flexibility” To Sell Wholesale Rural Sewer Services

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:35 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The mayor wants to amend a city law to increase flexibility for a GMA provision that should be used rarely, if ever at all.

3 comments; last on Feb 11, 2014

The Hidden Costs of Costco

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 2:36 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Costco imposes indirect costs on our community that are as real and tangible as road construction expenses.

1 comments; last on Feb 13, 2014

Reid Boiler Works Burns Down

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:13 am  //  John Servais

The old empty Reid Boiler Works industrial building in Fairhaven burned to the ground Saturday night.

0 comments

Panem et Circenses - Why I Did Not Watch “The Super Bowl”

Mon, Feb 03, 2014, 5:30 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Professional and even college sports have morphed into a circus of corporate greed and the fleecing of the public.

3 comments; last on Mar 01, 2014

Have You Exceeded Your Right To Information?

Sat, Feb 01, 2014, 12:35 am  //  Wendy Harris

Filing a public record request could land a citizen in jail under a proposal reflected in a Herald opinion article.

2 comments; last on Feb 03, 2014

Wendy Harris Receives deArmond Award for Citizen Journalism

Wed, Jan 29, 2014, 6:18 am  //  Guest writer

Tim Johnson writes about the first recipient of the Paul deArmond Citizen Journalism award, Whatcom County writer Wendy Harris.

3 comments; last on Feb 08, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XI - The Doldrums at University Ridge

Mon, Jan 20, 2014, 5:14 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The developers of University Ridge have been silent since shortly after the hearing examiner's decision on 23 October last year. Will they walk?

0 comments

The Marijuana Bowl

Sun, Jan 19, 2014, 8:39 pm  //  John Servais

Super Bowl ... Weed Bowl ... This bud's for you ... Bong Bowl ... Marijuana Bowl ... whatever. It is on!

1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2014

Port’s Alternative Marina Analysis a Scam

Tue, Jan 14, 2014, 2:19 pm  //  Guest writer

Do we actually need to say that we, as citizens, want accurate information from government officials?

1 comments; last on Jan 14, 2014

City too Poor for Power Pennies or Discrimination?

Fri, Dec 27, 2013, 4:00 am  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Barbara Perry writes about Bellingham Parks refusal to allow motorized wheel chairs to recharge at public electrical outlets.

6 comments; last on Jan 03, 2014

Port Memo Addresses Marina Fraud Allegations

Fri, Dec 20, 2013, 3:56 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A Port of Bellingham internal memo tries, but fails, to justify changes in cost estimates for alternative marina sites.

5 comments; last on Dec 22, 2013

Lummi Influence Over the Waterfront Planning Process Continues to Grow

Tue, Dec 17, 2013, 12:21 am  //  Wendy Harris

Army Corps advised DOE that it will not issue a waterfront permit without Lummi approval

2 comments; last on Jan 13, 2014

Gary Jensen Not Running for State Senate

Mon, Dec 16, 2013, 12:30 pm  //  John Servais

Ferndale Mayor Gary Jensen has decided not to file for the 42nd state Senate seat currently held by Doug Ericksen.

5 comments; last on Dec 24, 2013

Larrabee School; Its Future

Mon, Dec 09, 2013, 12:24 pm  //  Guest writer

Barbara Perry writes about the closed nature of the Bellingham School Board on the future of the Larrabee School.

1 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Steal this Waterfront: Costs without Benefit

Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 8:23 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the direct, indirect, hidden and lost opportunity costs make this a waterfront boondoggle of billions

3 comments; last on Dec 11, 2013

On Monday, City Council Votes “third and final” Approval of Waterfront Plan

Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 12:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Local activist calls on Bellingham City Council to table the unpopular waterfront plans and engage in meaningful public process

2 comments; last on Dec 08, 2013

Lecture on County Water Issues Draws Crowd

Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 11:03 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The county will be required to consider water quality and water quantity when planning rural growth.

3 comments; last on Dec 10, 2013

Video Exposes City Council Dysfunction on Waterfront Plan

Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 11:58 am  //  John Servais

The Political Junkie has posted a 3 minute video showing Bellingham City Council members explaining their idiocy for all of us to watch.

2 comments; last on Dec 06, 2013

The Bellingham “Riot” - Let’s Expand the Conversation

Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 5:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The post "riot" conversation is terribly lacking in several areas. We must expand the discussion or risk learning little from the experience.

3 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Cascadia Weekly Blasts Waterfront Plan

Wed, Dec 04, 2013, 10:53 am  //  John Servais

Bellingham City Council and Port of Bellingham finalize the waterfront plan. In his weekly Gristle, Tim Johnson blasts the corrupt public process.

4 comments; last on Dec 05, 2013

Waterfront Development Bonus Yet Another Bad Idea

Sat, Nov 30, 2013, 8:11 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The waterfront plan allows a development bonus for payments made to the Lake Whatcom land acquisition fund

1 comments; last on Dec 01, 2013

City and Port Ready To Act on Waterfront Plan

Fri, Nov 29, 2013, 9:43 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A number of important issues need to be resolved before waterfront planning is complete, but the city council and port commission are ready to act.

2 comments; last on Nov 30, 2013

Port Unable To Protect Public Safety

Fri, Nov 22, 2013, 9:01 pm  //  Wendy Harris

If the port can not construct the airport safely, should it be entrusted with dangerous waterfront cleanup work?

0 comments

Walmart and McDonald’s - Partners in Institutionalized Cluelessness

Wed, Nov 20, 2013, 5:03 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The advice coming from Walmart and McDonald's to its low paid employees becomes more and more bizarre and inane.

0 comments

Anatomy of a Development - Part X Appeals of the Hearing Examiner’s Decision

Tue, Nov 19, 2013, 5:35 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling's motion to the hearing examiner for reconsideration was definitively rejected. The developer has not met the deadline for an appeal to the Superior Court

0 comments

Smoking Gun: Fraud and Deception

Mon, Nov 18, 2013, 2:18 pm  //  Guest writer

In which we find the hidden core of the waterfront plan is rotten through and through

7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013

County Releases EIS, Prepares to Purchase Jail Site

Mon, Nov 18, 2013, 10:59 am  //  Riley Sweeney

The county takes two big steps forward on the new jail, while still missing the point

0 comments

Noballmacare and Setting the False Standard

Thu, Nov 14, 2013, 1:39 am  //  Tip Johnson

Dear Mr. President, There's a sucker born every minute, and two to take him.

7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013

City Council Misled On Waterfront Planning

Wed, Nov 13, 2013, 3:16 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The city adminstration has been providing misleading/ incorrect information to the city council to avoid waterfront plan revisions.

1 comments; last on Nov 18, 2013

Election Analysis: What Happened with the Port Races?

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 10:21 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley crunches the numbers on Renata and McAuley's races to find answers

2 comments; last on Nov 13, 2013

Puget Neighborhood Likely New Home for 1,300 Students

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 5:16 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Puget Neighborhood will likely have in the immediate future 1,300 new rental units that will be marketed primarily to the student population.

0 comments

Gloomy Fate For Waterfront Wildlife

Sat, Nov 09, 2013, 9:47 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The COB administration continues in its refusal to analyze waterfront wildlife issues, even though this is a prerequisite step in protecting wildlife from the impacts of development

3 comments; last on Nov 10, 2013

Election Results - November 2013

Tue, Nov 05, 2013, 8:21 pm  //  John Servais

With lots of outside county money flowing in to our local races, this election is weird. But real - and we county residents have spoken.

11 comments; last on Nov 09, 2013

Health Insurance Scams - Washington Not Spared

Mon, Nov 04, 2013, 9:55 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The call of the dollar speaks more loudly to health insurance companies than does the voice and well-being of the consumer, even here in Washington.

8 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

Anatomy of a Development - Part IX BMC Rule of Three Thwarts Plans

Thu, Oct 31, 2013, 10:19 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Four bedroom dorm rooms have been nixed by the hearing examiner. University Ridge may be in trouble as a cash cow for Ambling Development of Georgia

3 comments; last on Nov 04, 2013

The Slaughterhouse Referendum - Citizens Opposing Widespread Slaughter (COWS)

Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 10:19 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein we discover why we exert our rights - and grab some more petitions before it's too late

3 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

Dick’s Picks for City Council - Burr and Petree

Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 12:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Independent voters are for independent thinkers on the city council. Vote for Burr and Petree.

0 comments

Boulevard Park Reopens

Sat, Oct 26, 2013, 7:36 pm  //  John Servais

Beach reconstruction is done at Boulevard Park on the Bellingham waterfront. Paths along shore are again open - and it looks good.

6 comments; last on Nov 01, 2013

 

New Links

Julia Ioffe/New Republic
the Oatmeal

Current Interest

Community Wise Bellingham
counterpunch
Friends of Whatcom
Guardian Unlimited
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections

Publisher Recommended

counterpunch
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Bellingham Police Activity
Chuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW
Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy

Good Links

Al-Jazeera online
Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Internet At Its Best

TED

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register
Carl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers