Open letter to Bellingham Planning Director Jeff Thomas re: Fairhaven Highlands application deadline

Permalink +

Sun, Oct 31, 2010, 7:20 pm  //  Larry Horowitz

Update Oct 31:

Upon further review of the correspondence between the applicant’s attorney and Interim Planning Director Jeff Thomas, it’s not clear whether there has been any meeting of the minds.

In the attorney’s Oct 28 letter, he observes that the revised estimate for the EIS of $345,000 substantially exceeds the initial contract amount of $75,000.  I agree.  But is anyone really surprised by the cost overrun?

When the city went out to bid back in 2007, five consulting firms submitted proposals, which ranged from an estimate of 489 hours (ESA Adolfson) to 2,082 hours (Wheeler Consulting Group).  ESA Adolfson was the consultant hand-picked and recommended by the developer.  Wheeler was a primary author of the 1995 Chuckanut Ridge EIS and was very familiar with the property. 

It was obvious to everyone that ESA’s bid, which was less than one-fourth of Wheeler’s, was insufficient.  As it turns out, the final estimate of $345,000 is about 4 ½ times the initial estimate, or roughly what Wheeler proposed.  Why is anyone surprised that ESA’s estimate was way too low?  And how can the developer complain now when the city selected the developer’s hand-picked consultant?

The attorney goes on to assert the applicant’s right to seek mediation or other informal alternative dispute resolution if the applicant does not agree to the projected, additional expenses to complete the EIS.  So, the applicant “sets aside” its request for an extension only to implement an alternate delay tactic.  The attorney has asked the city to compile time and expense records, a task estimated to take at least 30 days.  Then, after that’s complete, the applicant will likely seek mediation to delay the process further.  An obvious stall tactic.

Finally, the attorney indicates that the applicant may “wish to revisit ‘suspension’ of these processes” at some point in the future.  WTF?

In Mr. Thomas’ Oct 29 letter, he enumerates the terms of this new “agreement” with clear deadlines for items 1-3 and a vague, unenforceable provision for item 4.  He also states that the city does not agree to any future “suspension” of the EIS process (nice work, Jeff).

Finally, in the attorney’s Oct 29 letter, he states that the applicant, Greenbriar NW Associates, “does object to the proposed contract revision” and wishes “to exercise its contractual rights of review and negotiation.”

And so the stall begins.  Who needs an extension when you can game the system so easily?

- Has there been any meeting of the minds? 

- Is the EIS process moving forward? 

- Has the applicant violated the city’s 120-day deadline? 

- Are these applications now null and void?

Who knows?

_________________________________________________

 

Update Oct 29, 6:00 pm:

This afternoon, the City of Bellingham posted two additional letters from the applicant’s attorney and one letter from the Interim Planning Director Jeff Thomas, as follows:
Letter from Langabeer & Tull to Jeff Thomas dated Oct 28 (here)
Letter from Langabeer & Tull to Jeff Thomas dated Oct 29 (here)
Letter from Jeff Thomas to Langabeer & Tull dated Oct 29 (here)
Based on my (very brief) initial review of these letters, it appears that the developers have “set aside” (read withdrawn) their extension request and are now willing to re-start the SEPA and environmental impact statement (EIS) process based on the following terms, as listed in Jeff Thomas’ Oct 29 letter:
1. The developers will pay $9,221.38 by Nov 5 for work already completed by the EIS consultant, ESA Adolfson.
2. The city will compile all time & billing records for work completed on the EIS by the city and by ESA and forward to the developers by Nov 30.
3. The city will propose changes to the original EIS agreement, including a detailed scope of work for the additional $107,802, and forward to the developer by Nov 30.
4. The developer must then “commence good faith negotiations in a timely manner to amend the Agreement” or the applications will become “null and void.”
My take: Although the first three requirements are clear enough to determine if they have been satisfied, the fourth item is so vague that compliance will be difficult – if not impossible - to determine.  Such vague terms as “good faith negotiations” and "timely manner” provide too much flexibility to be strictly enforced.  Once again, the city seems to have placed itself in a position that it will not be able to enforce its own laws. 
It is essential that a time limit be established following the Nov 30 deadline for items 2 and 3 so that enforcement is possible on item 4.  For example, item 4 could state that the amendment must be signed and the $107,802 balance paid within 14 days of items 2 and 3 being satisfied.  Further, the applicant's responses to comments on the Draft EIS must be received within 30 days after the amended agreement has been signed.
Failure to establish enforceable provisions will allow the developer to drag out the process as it has already done for more than five years.  The city attorney needs to modify these terms ASAP.
________________________
Update: Oct 29, 10:00 am:
I just spoke with Jeff Thomas’ assistant who stated she is not aware of any final decision being made on the extension request.
Regarding the assertion by the applicant’s attorney that the city cannot deny the extension request because of the “clear prohibitions … against governmental bodies using their police power jurisdiction to reduce the value…”  I have posted David Bricklin’s response here.  As Mr. Bricklin states, “Mr. Tull is guilty of mis-leading you with a statement that is only half true and which is totally inapplicable here.”
______________________
 
Original Post: Thur, Oct 28, 10:30 am
 
Dear Mr. Thomas:
 
As you know, BMC 21.10.190.C is the City of Bellingham’s law as it applies to the expiration of development applications.  It states:
 
“Any complete land use application for which no substantial steps have been taken to respond to the City's request for revisions, corrections or additional information within 120 days of the written determination will expire and become null and void.”
 
In other words, the city has a standard 120-day deadline for applicant’s to respond to the city’s request for information.  Only by exception is the 120-day deadline extended.
 
Due to the applicant’s failure to respond, the Fairhaven Highlands application was set to expire on April 30, 2010.  It was extended and was set to expire on July 30.  It was extended again and is now set to expire on October 29.
 
In his October 12 letter to you, the applicant’s attorney asserts that the city’s desire to enforce its own application expiration law is a form of “pushback” from your department.  As a citizen whose rights are upheld by city laws, I am offended by this assertion.  As anyone who has followed this application knows, the city has bent over backwards to accommodate the applicant.  
 
In his letter, the applicant’s attorney also asserts that a recent city ordinance “explicitly recognizes an applicant’s right to request a project extension in the event of economic hardship, which is certainly the case here.”
 
First, the attorney is referring to Ordinance 2010-05-026 and BMC 21.10.260.D.  As you know, this ordinance and code section only apply to “issued land use approvals,” not to land use applications.  Since there are no land use approvals associated with the Fairhaven Highlands applications, the attorney’s reference is not valid.  Further, the attorney’s inference that Fairhaven Highlands is “a project not subject to any deadline” simply ignores BMC 21.10.190.C, which establishes a clear deadline to prevent an application from expiring.
 
Second, this ordinance and code section require the applicant to submit a “sworn declaration” that the delay is “a result of an inability to secure financing.”  As you know, one of the property owners is among the 80 largest banks in the United States with assets in excess of $13 billion.  It is simply not fathomable that the applicant is unable to secure financing.  Again, the attorney’s reference to this ordinance is not valid.
 
The applicant’s attorney also asserts that “the only aspect of this project that has any time sensitivity is the informational staleness.”  Again, untrue.  As the attorney knows, the only reason the applicant continues to request extensions is to preserve its “presumed” ability to circumvent the 2005 Bellingham Critical Areas Ordinance.  As a homeowner who is extremely concerned about the safety risks imposed by the Fairhaven Highlands application - including “injury, loss of life, or property damage due to landslides and steep slope failures, erosion, seismic events, or flooding” – I am appalled that city would even consider such a circumvention of a public safety ordinance.  Clearly, the applicant’s attorney is being less than honest with you.
 
Finally, the applicant’s attorney seems to imply that denial of the extension request would amount to a “police power jurisdiction to reduce the value” of the land.  Again, I am offended.  Mayor Pike has made it clear that your determination is completely separate from any potential land acquisitions by the city.  Such an implied accusation by the applicant’s attorney is both offensive and without merit.  Bully tactics such as these should not be catered to.
 
I join with thousands of residents in south Bellingham and request that the applicant’s extension request be denied.  The applicant’s “critical issues” which prevent it from moving forward provide no justifiable reason for yet another extension.  

Ham Hayes  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 10:53 am

Larry, as usual your article is well researched and articulated. 

I would hope that Bellingham city officials show some transparency by providing a timely response to your letter.  Please keep us apprised!

Ham


Sheri Ward  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 1:11 pm

Larry,

Thanks for the well-researched article.  I agree the extension is unwarranted. 

Aside from this immediate decision, the city owes its citizens a thorough review of the zoning for this parcel, which in the opinion of many is total inappropriate.  When we first moved to town in 1985, we could not fathom why such a steep and environmentally important piece of land would be zoned for high density development.  Add to that, its inaccessibility if the 12th Street bridge were to be blocked for some long or short span of time, the current zoning simply doesn’t make any sense. 

Our city administrators and elected officials can make this right if they so choose.  Let’s hope they do.


Vince Biciunas  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 1:14 pm

Thank you Larry for an excellent letter to Acting Planning Director Jeff Thomas.

I agree with every point you have made and plan to send that message directly to Mr Thomas today.

There is no defensible reason for a third extension to this application.


Daniel Warner  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 1:46 pm

Larry, thanks for your continued work on this project.

Eben Fodor observes in his book “Better, Not Bigger” that planners support the growth machine:

“Support for the growth machine often comes from professionals whose jobs are directly connect with growth. . . .The business of planning has become primarily the process of accommodating growth.  With out growth, the role of the urban planner would need to be greatly refined.  When planners are called upon to evaluate growth management policies, it?s not surprising tat they are often less than enthusiastic about policies that might actually slow or stop growth.?

It wasn?t always so.  During the 1960s and 1970s a rich theoretical literature grew up featuring a serious critique of planning and the profession.  In part this took the form of increasing citizens? involvement in planning decisions.  A loose coalition of essentially liberal-minded planners rallied under the banner of a choice theory of planning, emphasizing citizen choice in, and even determination of, planning decisions.  The rise of Reaganism and Thatcherism, among other trends, soon caused a retreat from the ?radical? idea that planning should emphasize citizens? choice.  Planners soon returned to ?disciplinary traditions? with ?direct attacks on social theories that are perceived as harming the professional credibility of planning, and a renewed emphasis on public-private partnerships in the development process? (Michael J. Dear, The Postmodern Urban Condition, p. 122).  The planners? role is to assist government in the administration of ?government intervention in the private land-development process? (id., at 123).

And Wendell Berry writes: ?That human limitedlessness is a fantasy means, obviously, that its life expectancy is limited.  There is now a growing perception, and not just among a few experts, that we are entering a time of inescapable limits.  We are not likely to be granted another world to plunder in compensation for our pillage of this one.?

Thanks again for your comments Larry, and thanks John S. for your work on this blog.

Dan Warner


Larry Horowitz  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 2:12 pm

Some might be wondering why I waited until Oct 27 to respond to the Oct 12 letter from the developer?s attorney, especially in light of the Oct 29 deadline. 

The answer is actually quite simple.  Those of us who contacted the planning dept were told ? incorrectly it turns out - that the city had not received any letters from the developers or their attorney.  Even when I called on Oct 25, I was told that the city had not received any letters.

None of us had any clue the city had received the Oct 12 letter until it was placed on the city?s website on the afternoon of Oct 26.

How’s that for transparency, Ham?


Ham Hayes  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 3:07 pm

Methinks our governments think we work for them, rather than the opposite case. 

The unwillingness or inability of our government to respond in even a nominal way to legitimate concerns is what drives the current anti-incumbent mood of our country.

From Plato, “Excess generally causes reaction, and produces a change in the opposite direction, whether it be in the seasons, or in individuals, or in governments.” In this case, either excess secrecy or excess incompetence…or perhaps a bit of both.


Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 3:31 pm

Larry,

Thomas asked that Tull and his client provide further detail on the “crucial issues” facing the project by October 22nd.  Have you seen the response?

Besides objecting to the project’s reliance on archaic critical areas regulations, I agree with Vince Biciunas that it is past time to review the phony zoning.

The DEIS adequately demonstrated that even half of the zoned density cannot be built without unacceptable adverse consequences to public health and the environment.

A normal zoning review was never done.  A former top City planner once described the assignment of the land use designation as “a mystery at best”.  The project furthers not one neighborhood goal or objective, instead hampering many.

It is clear from the record, or lack thereof, that this zoning was implemented specifically to make development of the property feasible in view of prerequisite conditions considered imperative at the time. That is not a legitimate basis for zoning. The project’s failure to contemplate these prerequisite conditions further argues for a review of the zoning and necessary conditions.

Beyond that, the City’s miraculous and erroneous Determination of Completeness, upon which this projects “vesting” rests, should be reviewed and the citizen appeal processed.

It is time for City planners to do their job:

1) Retroactively review the project’s Determination of Completeness and process the citizen appeal,
2) Insist on current development regulations,
3) Assure that zoning is rationally derived, not invented to benefit a single landowner at tremendous cost to the community, and
4) In the interest of regulatory consistency, adopt a policy that no project may be extended unless it meets all current development regulations.


Larry Horowitz  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 4:07 pm

Tip,

The only response to Jeff Thomas? request for more information that I have seen is the attorney?s Oct 22 letter in which he states that he is ?working on providing additional information and will be in touch early in the week.?

I just spoke with Jeff Thomas who stated that as of 12:30 today he had not received any additional information.  He was on his way to check today?s incoming mail.

Here?s a link to Oct 22 letter:
+ Link info/eis-correspondence/2010-10-22-tull-ltr-to-thomas.pdf


Larry Horowitz  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 4:48 pm

BREAKING!

I?m sorry to report that it appears the city is too afraid to enforce its own application extension law and will ONCE AGAIN approve another 120-day extension.  Veiled threats of a lawsuit seem to have made the difference.

Pitchforks, anyone?


Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 4:52 pm

Seems to me that “on or before October 22nd” was pretty clear and Tull definitely missed it.  That should kill the extension, shouldn’t it?


Larry Horowitz  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 5:22 pm

That would presume that the public?s business is being handled in public.  The attorney has personally visited with Mr. Thomas on more than one occasion.  There is no paper trail of these meetings, so no one knows what?s being discussed.  When I asked for meeting notes, I was told, ?We generally don?t take notes at these meetings.?

Sounds very ?Mission Impossible? to me.  Perhaps they have recordings that self-destruct?


Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Oct 28, 2010, 5:31 pm

This continues the City’s pattern of not doing what it is supposed to do whenever it might interfere with this project and doing things it shouldn’t if it might help.

Planning of by and for the developers?


Samish Way Experience - Drug Dealing Dangers?

Wed, Sep 17, 2014, 10:26 am  //  John Servais

We post a disturbing report of a personal encounter along Samish Way, with the permission of John Stark, who experienced it.

2 comments; last on Sep 17, 2014

Who Will Be Appointed to Lehman’s City Council Seat?

Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 8:21 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley and John share the short list of who might replace Cathy Lehman on the Bellingham city council on January 5.

8 comments; last on Sep 10, 2014

Johns Repair

Specializing in German vehicles...

An Imminent Threat:  The State Plans for CBR Disaster While Counties Punt

Mon, Aug 25, 2014, 11:48 am  //  Terry Wechsler

While the state spends hundreds of thousands of dollars defining risks of crude by rail, Skagit County finds no significant adverse impacts of a crude-by-rail proposal.

1 comments; last on Aug 28, 2014

You can’t fight city hall: city hall doesn’t fight fair

Fri, Aug 22, 2014, 2:06 pm  //  Guest writer

Patrick McKee of the Sunnyland Neighborhood guest-writes about the August 11 City Council slap-dash zoning changes.

2 comments; last on Aug 23, 2014

Good Friends and Neighbors:  What $54 Million Doesn’t Buy, Part 2

Wed, Aug 20, 2014, 4:54 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Not content with causing massive inconvenience, BNSF is now literally dumping on county residents.

10 comments; last on Aug 26, 2014

Devil In the Details

Sat, Aug 16, 2014, 3:48 pm  //  Guest writer

Judith Green of the Sunnyland Neighborhood guest writes this brief summary of what went wrong with the planning last week.

1 comments; last on Aug 22, 2014

Good Friends and Neighbors:  What $54 Million Doesn’t Buy

Fri, Aug 15, 2014, 7:12 am  //  Terry Wechsler

A massive upgrade of the Cascade [rail] Corridor has left residents stranded and the sheriff asking Washington, DC, to intervene.

7 comments; last on Sep 02, 2014

Reliable Prosperity

Thu, Aug 14, 2014, 3:13 pm  //  Guest writer

Sandy Robson guest writes of the need for real prosperity at Cherry Point, not a destructive short term coal port that destroys the fishing grounds.

4 comments; last on Aug 18, 2014

Fleetwood versus Ericksen: What Happened in Round One?

Tue, Aug 12, 2014, 10:52 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Some Context for the Primary Results

0 comments

The Rule of Law - Bellingham Style

Mon, Aug 11, 2014, 11:31 pm  //  John Servais

Bellingham City Council abruptly changes zoning codes to force Planning Department plan on Sunnyland residents.

7 comments; last on Aug 14, 2014

Final Updated Election Results

Fri, Aug 08, 2014, 10:10 am  //  John Servais

Updated Wed evening. The Tuesday evening 8:20 pm Auditor report on the election is in.

5 comments; last on Aug 08, 2014

Councilmember Murphy’s Proposed Rental Ordinance Is Deeply Flawed

Fri, Aug 01, 2014, 8:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Councilmember Murphy's proposal is based on a complaint-based rental ordinance from Tacoma, demonstrated to do little for the health and safety of tenants.

9 comments; last on Aug 04, 2014

Trial by Fire:  A Rising Tide of Civil Disobedience

Fri, Aug 01, 2014, 4:47 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Carefully planned actions are rolling across the state to make the point that it's not OK to expose us to risks associated with CBR.

7 comments; last on Aug 04, 2014

Northwest Citizen Releases Polling of Whatcom Voters

Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 11:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Northwest Citizen has conducted a phone poll of likely voters, with some surprising results!

9 comments; last on Jul 29, 2014

Plan Commission & Samish Neighbors Bypassed on Rezone Docketing

Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 7:52 am  //  Dick Conoboy

In contravention of the Bellingham Municipal Code, the City Council will consider on 4 August a last minute docketing request that ignores the Planning Commission and Samish Neighborhood.

1 comments; last on Jul 30, 2014

Sunnyland Planning Process Explained - Partially

Wed, Jul 23, 2014, 10:47 pm  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Mike Rostron explains how Bellingham city planners played loose and illegal with planning processes.

0 comments

City Council Approves Resident’s Sunnyland Plan

Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 7:22 pm  //  John Servais

Sunnlyland residents win one - after a seven year effort. Planning Department failed them and all of us.

2 comments; last on Jul 23, 2014

What Landlords Need to Know about Rental Registration

Mon, Jul 21, 2014, 5:30 am  //  Guest writer

Landlords are so caught up opposing a licensing and inspection ordinance, they cannot see the upside for them in ridding the city of bad rentals.

19 comments; last on Aug 01, 2014

Sunnyland Deja Vu

Fri, Jul 18, 2014, 1:24 pm  //  Guest writer

Judith Green explains how the Bellingham Planning Department is trying to cram their plan onto a neighborhood.

5 comments; last on Jul 21, 2014

Trial by Fire:  Call to Action to Comment on the BP Pier Expansion

Sun, Jul 13, 2014, 2:26 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Years after BP completed its north dock, the Army Corps of Engineers released a draft EIS and it's really really stupid.

0 comments

Intrado Not to Intrude in Bellingham

Tue, Jul 08, 2014, 8:20 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The city council "persuades" the city administration to withdraw a request for an intrusive police threat warning system

2 comments; last on Jul 08, 2014

Power to the Permit! (or Closely Hold This!)

Mon, Jul 07, 2014, 6:54 am  //  Terry Wechsler

It is time we stop allowing corporations to externalize the costs associated with their risky business practices, and demand more from our regulators who hold the keys to…

3 comments; last on Jul 13, 2014

Manifest Clandestine-y

Mon, Jul 07, 2014, 5:04 am  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Sandy Robson breaks the story of officials from Washington treated to a coal-promoting junket to Wyoming.

2 comments; last on Jul 13, 2014

A Question of Freedom

Fri, Jul 04, 2014, 5:00 am  //  Guest writer

Ferndale's most famous landmark is frequently commented on and is often in the news. Here is their side of the story.

4 comments; last on Jul 07, 2014

Trial by Fire: Lessons Not Learned One Year after Lac-Megantic

Wed, Jul 02, 2014, 5:14 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

On the anniversary of the Lac-Megantic disaster, communities throughout North America rally in solidarity to remember and protest wholly inadequate government response to crude-by-rail's risks.

4 comments; last on Jul 12, 2014

Sins of Omission

Fri, Jun 27, 2014, 9:01 pm  //  Guest writer

In the Weekly, Tim Johnson left out three words in quoting Craig Cole - and his story misleads readers. Guest article by Sandy Robson.

11 comments; last on Jul 01, 2014

DOJ Grant Brings Confusion and Anger to City Council Meeting

Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 10:24 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The Bellingham Police Department wants to purchase "threat assessment" software with federal monies. Citizen comments were vehement and negative. City Council confused.

5 comments; last on Jul 03, 2014

Widespread Slaughter Won’t Work

Tue, Jun 17, 2014, 10:18 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the failings of a bad policy framework are revealed

1 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

Fireworks Ban in Bellingham in Effect as of 18 June

Tue, Jun 17, 2014, 7:53 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The possession and use of consumer fireworks are no longer permitted within the city limits.

1 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

Herald and Weekly Withhold the News

Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 11:39 am  //  John Servais

Wyoming Senators and coal honchos were in Whatcom County June 10 - to hold a news conference with select reporters.

7 comments; last on Jun 20, 2014

Dawn Sturwold Retiring End of Month

Tue, Jun 10, 2014, 11:20 am  //  John Servais

Bellingham Hearing Examiner, Dawn Sturwold, retires in three weeks. Successor selection is hidden from all of us.

3 comments; last on Jun 11, 2014

Stay the Frack Out of Our Forearc Redux

Fri, Jun 06, 2014, 2:07 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Part 2: Following Ken Oplinger to California, and Home Again

4 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

The Road to Perdition

Sun, Jun 01, 2014, 12:39 am  //  Guest writer

A Venn diagram where coal, the Endangered Species Act, Republicans, and Wyoming’s Board of Education collide.

2 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014

Feint, Calumny, Solidarity

Wed, May 28, 2014, 3:15 pm  //  Guest writer

A perspective by guest writer Ellen Murphy reflects on the Whatcom Watch and the threatened law suit by Craig Cole.

22 comments; last on Jun 01, 2014

Extracting Profit and Destroying Experience: The Waterfront Plan

Tue, May 27, 2014, 1:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

Why was so little consideration given to the concept of developing the waterfront for eco-tourism?

5 comments; last on Jun 11, 2014

How Park Improvements Generate Heat

Mon, May 26, 2014, 7:51 pm  //  Wendy Harris

City park improvements have implications on the local and global scale.

2 comments; last on May 29, 2014

Montana & Wyoming to WA: Permit Coal Export Terminals… Or Else

Thu, May 22, 2014, 12:10 am  //  Guest writer

Wyoming is ready to try and legally force us to limit our environmental scoping for the Cherry Point coal terminal

4 comments; last on Jun 17, 2014

The Trojan Slaughterhouse and the Scrivener’s Errors

Sun, May 18, 2014, 11:57 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Reckless rezones and far-fetched explanations result in more slaughterhouses and meat packing plants

3 comments; last on May 20, 2014

Who Filed for Charter Review Commission?

Sat, May 17, 2014, 2:34 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley takes a closer look at the Charter Review Commission candidates

2 comments; last on May 21, 2014

Bellingham’s 2013 Water Quality Report: The Facts But Not the Truth

Tue, May 13, 2014, 5:04 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Bellingham's annual water quality report indicates that city hall's propoganda machine is going strong

1 comments; last on May 14, 2014

Stay the Frack Out of Our Forearc

Sun, May 11, 2014, 2:20 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Part 1: Introduction to the Bellingham Basin’s Potential for Fracking, Earthquakes, and Earthquakes Due to Fracking

3 comments; last on May 14, 2014

Riley scoops Herald - again

Fri, May 09, 2014, 10:02 am  //  John Servais

The Political Junkie for Whatcom County - that would be Riley Sweeney - has Overstreet not running for reelection in the 42nd.

1 comments; last on May 13, 2014

An Imminent Threat

Fri, May 09, 2014, 6:10 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Why Washington must step in and assume lead agency status in Skagit County for the Shell crude by rail proposal.

6 comments; last on Jun 21, 2014

The Whatcom Republicans’ Huge PCO Advantage

Tue, May 06, 2014, 5:52 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

The value of a Precinct Committee Officer . . .

1 comments; last on May 07, 2014

‘Legislative Sausage” or “Slaughter this Ordinance”

Mon, May 05, 2014, 3:34 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the gyrations of the bid for widespread county slaughter are exposed.

2 comments; last on May 07, 2014

Move To Amend - Persons vs Corporations

Thu, May 01, 2014, 10:21 pm  //  Guest writer

Move to Amend is a national movement to amend the U.S. Constitution and define persons as people and speech as not money.

7 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014

SweenyPolitics:  Fleetwood files against Ericksen

Wed, Apr 30, 2014, 8:20 am  //  John Servais

Riley posted this morning that Seth Fleetwood has decided to challenge Doug Ericksen for state senate in the 42nd District.

1 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014

Planning or Development Commission?

Mon, Apr 28, 2014, 6:28 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Every Bellingham Planning Commission member has ties to development or development-related businesses.

4 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014

“Friends and Neighbors”?

Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 1:59 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

A closer look at Whatcom County's industrial "stewards of the environment."

4 comments; last on Aug 28, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Threatened

Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 11:43 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public needs to support city council and request that a waterfront habitat assessment include terrestrial species and habitat connectivity.

0 comments

Water, Water Everywhere, but ...

Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 2:57 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

or How Not to Plan for Future Generations' Water Needs

12 comments; last on Jun 30, 2014

Charter Review and District Only Voting

Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 10:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting

0 comments

Roosevelt Neighborhood Pleads for Left Turns

Wed, Apr 09, 2014, 9:07 am  //  Riley Sweeney

City pushes for Alabama Street improvements, residents speak out

3 comments; last on Apr 14, 2014

Assault

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 4:29 pm  //  Guest writer

By Christopher Grannis: Wherein despite every effort and expense, citizens cannot make the City follow the law or work for neighborhoods

2 comments; last on Apr 07, 2014

Killer Industrial Jobs or Long-term Job Killers?

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 12:52 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Why commenting on the EIS for Comp Plan revisions for Cherry Point means demanding an EIS in the first place.

5 comments; last on Jun 25, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XII - Citizens Win Against University Ridge

Wed, Apr 02, 2014, 6:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling University Development Group pulls out. University Ridge will not be built.

12 comments; last on Apr 06, 2014

Tell County To Expand Scope of EIS Review for Plants and Animals

Tue, Apr 01, 2014, 1:27 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Please help us protect county wildlife by ensuring that the scope of the EIS review is adequate. A sample scoping letter is included.

0 comments

Public May Comment On EIS Scoping For County Comp. Plan Until April 7th

Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 2:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public has a week to comment on the scope of issues reviewed under the EIS.

0 comments

My State of the Lake Report for 2014

Fri, Mar 28, 2014, 1:32 am  //  Wendy Harris

On March 26, 2014 the city and county provided their update and assessment on the status of Lake Whatcom. This is mine.

2 comments; last on Apr 01, 2014

County Considers Purchasing Toxic Property

Wed, Mar 19, 2014, 10:32 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into the county's plan to buy the county morgue

3 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

 

Election Info

Candidate Filings

Primary election results

Whatcom Auditor

Coal, Oil & Trains

Community Wise Bellingham

Powder River Basin R. C.

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Cascadia Weekly
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light

Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut Community Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham

Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW

Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Recreation Northwest
Sailing Anarchy

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The

Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
TED
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
Vox
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Police Activity

Bellingham Register
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders