The Port of Chmelik
Permalink +Tue, Nov 24, 2009, 4:12 am // John Servais
Seems like the offices of Frank Chmelik, the attorney for the Port of Bellingham, are becoming our defacto Port offices. Instead of conferences and meetings at the Port, the really important ones are being held in Frank's office. We know of a few deals that were negotiated there and agreed to there - and we can wonder how many more took place there.The convenient thing about these negotiations is they are secret and not subject to public disclosure. Thus, the Port can cut secret deals and still the commissioners can boast that they follow the public disclosure laws. It's all legal - and secret.
But it seems the deals aren't very good. The Lummis are refusing to allow the new drydock in Fairhaven to function until a monetary agreement is reached. So back to Chmelik's office the parties go - and presumably a couple Port staff also. Cmelik's Lummi agreement is defective and so he gets to earn even more fees fixing his own broken process. And is able to keep it secret for the Port.
So how much money has the Port paid Chmelik and his firm this year? And last year, and the one before? A million a year? Could be. Back 18 years ago, the Port paid him immensely to stop my public disclosure request. Maybe up to $100,000 to stop a citizen from reading a report the Port had contracted for with our money. So, his fees now would be of real interest to the taxpayers.
But we don't elect Chmelik. He has a right to go for all the fees he can get. We do have a few questions for the Port Commissioners we do elect. Why are you letting Chmelik run the Port? How much have you paid him each year? Why not hire competent staff and also hire a staff attorney at much lower cost? Of course I know some of the answers. Chmelik is able to protect the Port from public access to their actions - and they need that protection.
Lets lay the problem for the conflict between the Lummi Nation and Fairhaven Shipyards at the door of the Port of Bellingham. That is where it belongs. The Port tells a tenant they can do something and then the tenant is stopped cold because of the Port's incompetence. The Port needs major overhauling.
Paul de Armond // Tue, Nov 24, 2009, 11:07 am
Using false claims of attorney-client privilege to circumvent the Open Meetings and Public Disclosure acts has become a common tactic in recent years. It’s really just a stall, because the courts (all the way up to the Washington Supreme Court) have ruled that just passing something a government agency wants secret through an attorney doesn’t exempt it from disclosure. However, it does make it necessary for the public to go to the courts every time this dodge is attempted.
This enables public agencies to use public funds to circumvent sunshine laws enacted by the public through the initiative process.
The cure would be to gin up some specific actions to confront these abuses and then, when the courts rule in the public’s favor, follow through with complaints to the Washington Bar Association Ethics Committee and get some of these snakes disbarred.
It isn’t just the Port of Bellingham. The City of Seattle, local water districts and Western Washington University are just a few of the government entities who have availed themselves of this smokescreen.
Now, the Bar Association has an obvious interest in protecting clients and their counsel’s ability to discuss matters in confidence. But if privileged communications are subject to widespread abuse, the Bar has a responsibility to address the problem. If they don’t, it becomes a legitimate matter for public legislative action.
This is an abuse by the executive branch and the remedy lies in the judicial and legislative branches.
Doug karlberg // Wed, Nov 25, 2009, 1:56 pm
The people and legislature have spoken loud and clear. They demand to know what their government is doing.
As Jefferson so succinctly put it: ?Information is the currency of Democracy?
The Port?s attorney spits in the eye of all, with this culture of secrecy; The Lummi?Fairhaven Shipyard accord, being only the most recent. A two decade long culture of secrecy, now cleverly hidden behind the attorney-client privilege.
But who is Chmelik?s client; The Port management, or the citizens who own the Port? Chmelik clearly thinks that the Port management is his client. He is wrong, the citizens who own the Port are his clients, and this alone is enough reason to remove him.
But this is the tip of the iceberg. When a culture of secrecy invades the Port?s culture, the managers become used to being able to hide any variety of ?mistakes? from public view. When a culture pervades for two decades, secrecy hides precisely what the public wishes to know about how their Port is being managed. Voting without the basic information of Port Management Performance becomes a farce.
If we are denied the basic information necessary to become informed about what the Port is doing, and why: How would we know whether they are doing an adequate job on our behalf. Ask the Port?s managers, and they will always tell us they are doing a spectacular job; World class management, in fact.
Secrecy is used to hide embarrassing facts from the voters. Secrecy protects management, not the citizen owners. Ask the Port of Seattle how secrecy worked for them, when staff began hiding embarrassing details from the elected Commissioners.
Remember how the Port Commission incumbents paraded out the ground-breaking Lummi Accord, during the election campaign. Vote for us, we have negotiated a good deal with the Lummi Nation, which clears the way for job creation.
It has turned into a spectacular failure. We asked for details, but were told the details were secret. The details matter.
It is exceedingly difficult to challenge government run amok, especially by the common citizen. THEY KNOW THIS. This Lummi-Fairhaven Shipyard brings this Port management performance into public view in ways that other issues are not able to capture the public?s attention.
Why is this important?
New sewage treatment plant ? Pay Tribal Impact Fees.
Waterfront Redevelopment ? Pay more Tribal Impact Fees.
Additional water for our cities ? Jackpot! Pay huge Tribal Impact Fees.
This list will expand and impact all future development in Whatcom County. This gusher of tribal funding has been opened by the Port.
Let?s call these what they are ? taxes. The table has been set by the Port?s attorney.
Negotiate fees prior to beginning of the project? Makes sense. Unfortunately if this Lummi Accord is any illustration, even fairly bargained, public agreements are unilaterally renegotiable afterwards, like when the investments have been made, and you are bent over the railing. The Port will come to your defense; or will it?
The Port Attorney and Commissioners were quick to praise this agreement, but when it was broken, they are silent. Fairweather friends, and a warning to other Port customers, do not depend upon Port administration to come to your support.
Do we owe these Port negotiated Tribal Impact Fees at all?
Excellent question!!
Although the Port?s attorney has been dubbed a SuperLawyer, unfortunately for us it was not in the very specialized field of Native American Treaty Law. What legal basis do does the Lummi Tribe have to demand cash for a shipyard to lift a vessel?
We will never know, as it was done in secret.
Could the Port and their exclusive SuperLawyer be wrong, and we do not owe cash to the Lummi Tribe? Absolutely. The Port?s Superattorney is certainly not a recognized expert in Native American Treaty Law, but someone that was at these secret Lummi-Port meetings has determined that the citizens of Whatcom County owe fees to the Lummi Nation.
I hope the Port had expert legal counsel in these meetings, where new taxes were imposed upon us.
The normal procedure for projects that have impacts to salmon, is that the projects may be required to mitigate the damages to the resource. If the shipyard kills a 100 salmon smolt, then they could be forced to raise and release 1000 salmon smolt, but this new payment in CASH. Mitigation like the illustration above is often used, but CASH payments are a new twist, that I can find scant legal basis.
Regardless, the Port?s attorney should disclose the legal basis for this cash payment, and reveal the legal advice that supports these cash payments to the tribe. The legal advice provided to the Commissioners prior to their deciding to pay the Lummi?s for future impacts, is critical.
Gaming revenues are down for the Tribal casinos. They are desperate to replace this revenue. If the Port did not have the advice of a recognized Native American Treaty Law expert advising them, then the Lummi?s Cagey has pulled of a spectacular bluff, which I admire.
If the Port did not utilize an expert to determine that we in fact owed these impact fees, then I understand the Port negotiators wanting to keep this a secret from the public.
There is one problem though, these Tribal Impact Taxes comes out of their neighbors pocketbooks. They will remember getting skinned. This is not some sort of garden variety negotiation. When we are done negotiating, we need to be able to live as neighbors, forever.
This is just another tax that one way or another we will all have to pay, and the details are secret. Once the Port opened this spigot, there will be more Tribal taxes to come. We have not heard from the Nooksack tribe, but I am sure that we will.
The Impact Fee paying public, deserves to have the whole truth.
Lummi Ferry Petition is Linked
Wed, Sep 01, 2010, 2:40 pm // John Servais
A petition to the federal government online at skookum.us. It asks they step in to resolve the impasse between the Lummi and Whatcom County.0 comments
Lummi Island - The Price of Admission
Thu, Aug 26, 2010, 3:01 pm // Tip Johnson
Legal or Political Football?4 comments; last on Aug 27, 2010
Politics & Ice Water: Part 1 of ?
Sat, Aug 21, 2010, 8:07 am // Larry Horowitz
Politics is like a pool of ice water. When men jump in their balls shrivel up.5 comments; last on Aug 26, 2010
Lummi Island Softball
Fri, Aug 20, 2010, 3:26 pm // Tip Johnson
Islanders need a new game1 comments; last on Aug 24, 2010
Cantwell Confused
Wed, Aug 18, 2010, 4:07 pm // Tip Johnson
Ignoring the real problem3 comments; last on Aug 19, 2010
Election Results
Tue, Aug 17, 2010, 8:05 pm // John Servais
A running blog this election night0 comments
The Political Downzone of Responsible Land Use Planning
Mon, Aug 16, 2010, 12:55 pm // John Lesow
John Lesow rebuts Jack Petree's Herald oped article that strongly criticized county planning.30 comments; last on Aug 25, 2010
Herald runs a beautiful smear of Rossi
Mon, Aug 16, 2010, 12:03 pm // John Servais
Headline and article paint U.S. Senate candidate Dino Rossi very badly on final day ballots are mailed. The Bellingham Herald editors print a perfect smear.5 comments; last on Aug 18, 2010
Mail your ballot by Monday, 3 p.m.
Sat, Aug 14, 2010, 6:51 am // John Servais
Mailing even late Monday evening is gambling on its being counted. Mail in time.1 comments; last on Aug 14, 2010
Deceptive Herald article on planning
Fri, Aug 13, 2010, 8:39 am // John Servais
Am looking for a writer to rebut Jack Petree's BIAW propaganda article the Herald saw fit to print.3 comments; last on Aug 20, 2010
The Way I See It - Time to change
Wed, Aug 11, 2010, 4:00 pm // Ham Hayes
Fear and attack-rhetoric are leading us in the wrong direction.1 comments; last on Aug 12, 2010
Candidate choices of John Servais
Mon, Aug 09, 2010, 3:15 pm // John Servais
Personal opinion and recommendations from an independent liberal and progressive. ADDED more on Tuesday, Aug 10.3 comments; last on Aug 13, 2010
And in the 40th we have…..
Mon, Aug 09, 2010, 1:49 pm // Ham Hayes
Candidates, o candidates - where art thou? Monday Updates
2 comments; last on Aug 04, 2010
Where’s the Info?
Mon, Aug 09, 2010, 12:38 pm // Viki Warner
One week till the Primary, but no info?3 comments; last on Aug 09, 2010
Cooperation no substitute for small libraries
Sat, Aug 07, 2010, 8:18 am // John Servais
A library card from any Whatcom County library can now be used at any library in the county5 comments; last on Aug 15, 2010
40th District State Representative Pos 1 Primary - Tom Pasma’s Responses
Fri, Aug 06, 2010, 4:54 am // Ham Hayes
Tom answers our questions1 comments; last on Aug 08, 2010
40th District State Representative Pos 2 Primary - Rep. Jeff Morris’ Responses
Fri, Aug 06, 2010, 4:50 am // Ham Hayes
Jeff answers our questions0 comments
40th District State Representative Pos 1 Primary - Chuck Carrell’s Respones
Fri, Aug 06, 2010, 4:48 am // Ham Hayes
Chuck answers our questions0 comments
Act of War or Act of Congress?
Thu, Aug 05, 2010, 1:50 pm // Tip Johnson
Where, oh where, are our federal representatives?6 comments; last on Aug 06, 2010
A letter to the Bellingham City Council
Thu, Aug 05, 2010, 8:28 am // John Servais
We ask why the EIS extension was given to the Chuckanut Ridge developers when the city is negotiating to buy the property.0 comments
City bumbles on Chuckanut Ridge extension
Wed, Aug 04, 2010, 8:12 am // John Servais
Bellingham Planning Department is giving quiet extensions to the Chuckanut Ridge developer - propping up the property value.1 comments; last on Aug 04, 2010
Chuckanut Ridge Development Gets Extension
Mon, Aug 02, 2010, 1:30 pm // John Servais
Bellingham Planning Department gave a three month extension, till Oct 29, to Greenbriar2 comments; last on Aug 02, 2010
John Powers death, in the words of a friend
Sat, Jul 31, 2010, 9:29 pm // John Servais
John Powers died yesterday. Ted expresses his remembrance.0 comments
Raising a Village: Can the Bellingham Cooperative School be saved?
Fri, Jul 30, 2010, 10:54 am // Kamalla Rose Kaur
Mourning the loss of a valuable community asset
2 comments; last on Aug 01, 2010
The Way I See It - Mud resurrected
Wed, Jul 28, 2010, 4:39 am // Ham Hayes
It is time we gave “mud” back its good name.
0 comments
The Way I See It - En Garde
Wed, Jul 21, 2010, 4:42 am // Ham Hayes
“We have lots of robberies.” As I reported last week, that was the apocalyptic statement by the investigating officer to our recent plight in St.…0 comments
Greed: The Shadowy So-called Non-profit Taecan
Mon, Jul 19, 2010, 11:53 am // Tip Johnson
For-Profit Non-Profits - Pulling the Plug on Services0 comments
The Forsaken Constituents of Lummi Island
Mon, Jul 19, 2010, 11:20 am // Tip Johnson
Taxation without representation3 comments; last on Jul 28, 2010
Libraries are still very valuable
Fri, Jul 16, 2010, 8:18 pm // John Servais
The New Spice Man tells us why libraries are useful and valuable. This applies to all libraries.0 comments
Three Port Executive Finalists Withdraw
Fri, Jul 16, 2010, 1:30 pm // John Servais
In a surprise development, the Port of Bellingham is starting over again in their search for an executive director. Position now vacant for over a…1 comments; last on Jul 18, 2010
Book Review: Whole Earth Discipline
Fri, Jul 16, 2010, 4:44 am // Guest writer
Eric Hirst reviews this October 2009 book by Stewart Brand of Whole Earth Catalog fame. Stewart is critical of several mainstream environmental stances.
1 comments; last on Jul 19, 2010
NwCitizen 1995 to 2008
Early Northwest CitizenNew
Citizen TedSkookum.us
WikiLeaks.org
Current Interest
Auditor election pageSkookum.us
WA State Elections
Local
Bellingham HeraldBham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale R-J
Foothills Gazette
John Watts
KGMI
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
Mainstreampolitics
Northern Light
Northwest Review
Sam Taylor
Skookum.us
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Washington Outsiders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch
Local causes
Bham CofC political blogChuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
N. Cascades Audubon
N. Sound Conservancy
Neighborhood Schools Coalition
No Leaky Buckets
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Skookum.us
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Local Leisure
Adventures NWEntertainment NNW
Climate & Weather
Climate AuditWatts Up With That?
Weather by Cliff Mass
Cascadia
Crosscut SeattleJoel Connelly
Orcinus
Portland Indy Media
Seattle Indy Media
Washington Votes
Leisure
Am Cup - GGYC viewAm Cup legal fight
Worth checking out
Al-Jazeera onlineAlaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Buzz Flash
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Daily Beast, The
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Personal bio info
Politico
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
The Onion
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
WikiLeaks.org
ynetnews.com
Governments
Auditor election pageBellingham
Bham - PFD
Skagit County
The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Other - for whatever
BushFlash.comChickehhawks
Doonesbury
George Bush
Info Clearing House
Michael Moore
Reality News
The Crisis Papers
Third World Traveler
Unity08
Election 2009
- Candidate Forum - video- Mike McAuley endorsement
Bham #6 - Catherine Chambers
Bham #6 - Michael Lilliquist
Bham At Large - Orphalee
Bham At Large - Seth
County #1 - Dan McShane
County #1 - Kathy Kershner
County #2 - Ken Mann
County #2 - Mary B Teigrob
County #3 - Carl Weimer
County #3 - Michelle Luke
County At Large - Bill
County At Large - Laurie
Port #1 - John Blethen
Port #1 - Scott Walker
Port #2 - Doug Smith
Port #2 - Mike McAuley
2010 Winter Olympics
Amy Goodman InterrogationNo 2010 Olympics
No women ski jumpers
Olympics muzzle free speech
Olympics Resistance Network
Page of Links
Spectacle Vancouver
Zirin on Olympics
Less active
Eye on WhatcomPost-Oklahoman Confessions
The American Telegraph
Quiet, offline or dead
David HackworthGitmo prisoner 345
Mega Awesome
Not in my county
Parkenfarker
Pro-Whatcom


