Obamacare and the Coming (Not Again?) Wealth Transfer
Permalink +Wed, Mar 06, 2013, 10:05 am // Dick Conoboy
It is called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (short form: “Obamacare”). As with most laws nowadays, you can be sure that the effect of the law will be the polar opposite of the language in the legislation’s title. In this case Obamacare will be neither protective nor affordable.
Predictably, the cruel joke is on the American public who, for the most part, has swallowed the hype and thinks Obamacare will work. As long as our current medical industry is dishing out the care, medical insurance of the type required by the law will be next to useless against the obscene costs. But by then, medical insurers will be raking in billions in insurance premiums from the nearly 50 million now uninsured, many of whom are poor or nearly poor. It won’t matter whether the money is wrenched from their pockets or the coffers of the U.S. Treasury in the form of subsidies. The ultimate effect will be an enormous Obama-initiated transfer of wealth from these citizens [and from the government in the way of subsidies] to the grotesquely bloated medical care industry. It will amount to unarmed robbery of the public, but nobody in the health care industry will go to jail.
The salt in the wound is that insurance premiums will continue to skyrocket to pay for ballooning medical costs that have no justification in reality. These costs are yet another factor over which Obamacare will have no effect. An extensive article that appeared recently in Time Magazine tells the horrific story of medical charges. The piece, written by Steven Brill is entitled “Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us”. In the article, Brill takes apart actual hospital bills with the fury of a wild dog on a carcass, and exposes the insanity behind the often incomprehensible charges.
Brill’s partial assessment: “Unless you are protected by Medicare, the health care market is not a market at all. It’s a crapshoot. People fare differently according to circumstances they can neither control nor predict. They may have no insurance. They may have insurance, but their employer chooses their insurance plan and it may have a payout limit or not cover a drug or treatment they need. They may or may not be old enough to be on Medicare or, given the different standards of the 50 states, be poor enough to be on Medicaid. If they’re not protected by Medicare or they’re protected only partly by private insurance with high co-pays, they have little visibility into pricing, let alone control of it. They have little choice of hospitals or the services they are billed for, even if they somehow know the prices before they get billed for the services. They have no idea what their bills mean, and those who maintain the chargemasters [every hospital has its own internal price list called a “chargemaster”] couldn’t explain them if they wanted to.”
He goes on. “How much of the bills they end up paying may depend on the generosity of the hospital or on whether they happen to get the help of a billing advocate. They have no choice of the drugs that they have to buy or the lab tests or CT scans that they have to get, and they would not know what to do if they did have a choice. They are powerless buyers in a seller’s market where the only sure thing is the profit of the sellers.”
Obamacare will not cure this. There will be no single payer system to stand up to this pricing farce. Obama already negotiated with himself in his head and turned his “health” bill over to the insurance companies. It is corporate welfare at its finest. This, then, is the double whammy: unaffordable mandatory insurance coupled with unspeakably high medical costs.
According to another article, (Obmacare: Devils in the Details) on the website of Paul Craig Roberts of the Institute for Political Economy, “… [T]he cost of using the mandated policies will be prohibitive because of the large deductibles and co-pays. Many Americans will find themselves not only with a policy they can’t afford, but also with one they cannot afford to use. Those who cannot afford the insurance, even with a subsidy, will be faced with a costly penalty, and in many cases, this, too, will be difficult, if not impossible, to pay. As each year’s subsidy is based on last year’s income, there will be a substantial year-end tax liability for those who must repay the subsidy in whole or part because their income increased during the year. The stress alone from such a regressive scheme is, without a doubt, not conducive to good health and well-being.”
Roberts predicts, “Obama will rue the day that his name was put on this special interest legislation, and most Americans, once they realize what has been done to them, will be angry that special interests again prevailed over the health of the nation.”
I urge you to read both articles at the links above. Send copies to members of your family and, especially, provide them to your children or grandchildren, upon whom the burden of this travesty will fall. This horrendous legislation will affect every one of us in some way, shape or form. Mostly, it will bring terrible costs and confusion to those who can least afford it. It is a rip-off destined to fatten the health insurance companies, a fact most of the legislators knew the moment it was passed. But they held their noses lest the stench overwhelm them.
Bill Black // Thu, Mar 07, 2013, 8:59 pm
I went to Olympia for the introduction of HB 1085 on February 1st. 25 people testified….24 in support, and 1 opposed. Very compelling testimony from physicians, business people and ordinary people.
Dial up Health Care For All Washington for a look at where we need to go.
Leeches and blood letting had their day…..hoping to be able to say the same someday in regards to our current evil system of health care in this country.
+ Link
—
Dick Conoboy // Fri, Mar 08, 2013, 9:50 am
Thanks. I had not been following the particular efforts here in the state. Will take a look at the HB.
Alex McLean // Sat, Mar 16, 2013, 2:27 pm
Thanks for posting this.
I have scanned through the article, as it keeps gumming up the social sites, and must confess that my computer-age attention span and reluctance to read electronic book-form has handicapped my ability to get through all 20+ pages of it.
I don’t have read every page, however, since all of the gut instincts I have (“gut instincts” are NOT covered by Obamacare) tell me the story rings true. I hope the author, Steven Brill, wins the Pulitzer for this important effort.
It is likely that I am treading on familiar ground, covered in the article, but it seems to me the crux of this conundrum comes from the inordinate lobbying power—from the medical industry, insurance companies, big pharma, etc.—which leveraged this absurdity upon the American public. Obama may have wanted a good bill. Citizens certainly hoped for one. Congress may have been energized enough to tackle the challenge. But, due to the influence and power of these massive financial interests, we got reamed.
It is interesting to me that Republicans, who loathe the bill for forcing a Health Care “System” upon America, never once direct their attacks toward the insurance companies, hospitals, or big pharma which have made the Affordable Care Act such an obdurate farce. If the true grist and corruption of the special interests—the corporate powers that Republicans fawn over and bow to—were directly addressed, then they would be attacking “costs” of this bill from a consumer perspective or, at least, targeting the freakish over-charging that this Act and these corporate players allow and condone. They don’t do this, however, and it makes me ponder how much worse it would be if they were to rewrite this legislation.
As the root of the problems come from corporate greed, and since this corporate source is THE power behind this legislation, it will likely be up to citizens to march and petition in front of office towers and factories rather than wasting a minute of time in Washington DC. As disorganized and dumb as much of the “we are the 99-percent!” rallies were, this tactic, combined with an appeal that spreads across (nearly) every spectrum of our society, would likely instill enough shame amongst the shameless to inflict some change.
This article, also, explains how this whole nation is being crippled financially as we allow corporate interests to extort money from us while holding our physical health and well-being hostage.
I don’t follow this sort of thing too carefully.
So here is a question for the cyber-trust:
Is the current debate over a merger between Peace Health and Catholic Health Initiatives going to help, or exacerbate, our local rendition of this industrial/medical complex?
+ Link
Dick Conoboy // Fri, Apr 05, 2013, 12:17 pm
Alex,
Thank you for your well-considered reply that I did not read until today since I was travelling recently. Of course, we all know now the result of the attempt of Peace Health/Catholic Health to join forces. I do not see that the current decision is anything resembling a final decision on such a merger. The drumbeat for consolidation of these church-related entities across the nation has not ceased.
I would however change industrial/medical complex to faith-based/medical complex. That any particular religious entity be essentially the sole provider of medical services in an area is unacceptable to me.
Obamacare and the Coming (Not Again?) Wealth Transfer
Wed, Mar 06, 2013, 10:05 am // Dick Conoboy
4 comments; last on Apr 05, 2013
PeaceHealth Merger Threatens Women’s Health in Whatcom County
Tue, Feb 26, 2013, 6:39 am // Riley Sweeney
1 comments; last on Feb 26, 2013
Landmark Enterprises
The Big Business of Breast Cancer
Wed, Feb 08, 2012, 9:14 am // Guest writer
2 comments; last on Feb 11, 2012
Bad Idea, Wrong Place, and Wrong Time
Mon, Oct 31, 2011, 3:07 pm // Guest writer
Bob Ferris of Re-Sources takes a values based perspective on our community and a possible coal port.9 comments; last on Nov 02, 2011
From a Political Junkie: Abstaining from Abstinence-Only
Mon, Nov 29, 2010, 5:16 am // Riley Sweeney
4 comments; last on Dec 01, 2010
Questions on Health Care
Sat, Mar 27, 2010, 5:45 am // Craig Mayberry
Some questions on health care reform to our Congressional delegation.0 comments
Bellingham! It’s The Mercury!
Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 8:42 pm // Kamalla Rose Kaur
2 comments; last on Mar 15, 2010
Aging: The Times Are A-Changin’
Sat, Feb 27, 2010, 7:22 pm // Guest writer
By guest writer Nanette Davis, Ph.D. Elder care is a growing crisis nationally and locally.1 comments; last on Mar 02, 2010
The Way I See It - Don’t Eat That!
Wed, Jan 13, 2010, 5:59 am // Ham Hayes
What will New York's proposed salt reduction laws do for us?0 comments
Dear Mr. President
Thu, Dec 31, 2009, 6:15 pm // Tip Johnson
Tip writes a letter to President Obama about Health Care and about his concerns that Obama has sold us short.8 comments; last on Jan 04, 2010
Real Health Care Reform
Fri, Nov 27, 2009, 9:00 pm // Craig Mayberry
This is a reprint of one of my earlier posts on health care. The issue is more timely now and I thought I would re-enter it into the…4 comments; last on Dec 13, 2009
Changing the Power Structure
Wed, Sep 23, 2009, 10:38 pm // Craig Mayberry
3 comments; last on Sep 25, 2009
Food Safety Czar
Tue, Sep 15, 2009, 8:00 am // Craig Mayberry
Much has been made of czars in the current administration; however, one czar in particular should have people from both political sides a little nervous. In a case…4 comments; last on Sep 17, 2009
The Future of Health Care Reform
Wed, Aug 19, 2009, 12:18 am // Craig Mayberry
There is an increasingly wide divide in the health care debate that at its source comes down to a fundamental disconnect between the opposing sides. While the Democrats…4 comments; last on Aug 20, 2009
Price, Volume, Mix
Mon, Aug 10, 2009, 9:40 pm // Craig Mayberry
The health care debate seems to center on fixing two important problems. The first is the people who do not have any insurance, and the second is the…2 comments; last on Aug 11, 2009
Dear White House,
Thu, Aug 06, 2009, 11:11 pm // Craig Mayberry
(sent to flag@whitehouse.gov seeking clarification before I report on people providing erroneous information on health care reform)How are we suppose to know what is erroneous information abou
4 comments; last on Aug 07, 2009
The Public Health Care Option
Wed, Jul 15, 2009, 5:56 pm // Craig Mayberry
7 comments; last on Jul 20, 2009
Thanksgiving
Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 2:55 pm // John Servais
I just want anyone who comes by this site today to see a few positive and thankful words. My first thoughts were that my feelings lately are not…1 comments; last on Nov 27, 2008
Thanksgiving wishes from Lois Garlick
Thu, Nov 22, 2007, 3:35 pm // John Servais
This from Lois GarlickDear Friends,
Happy Thanksgiving to everyone.
And thank you. Your support in my campaign for County Executive was tremendous. I had no comprehension
0 comments
The war is wreaking havoc on all
Tue, Jun 12, 2007, 7:03 pm // Site Management
Armed Service veterans are twice as likely to commit suicide as civilians. Just another intangible cost of the insane war in Iraq. (It applies to all male vets…0 comments
Fluoridation
Wed, Oct 19, 2005, 3:28 pm // John Servais
Got your attention? Time magazine has an article this week about our Bellingham fight over whether or not to put fluoride in our drinking water. It is worth…0 comments
Like toxic water flowing from GP
Sat, Jul 02, 2005, 4:18 pm // Site Management
The link to No Forced Fluoride in Bellingham is posted to the right. The pro-fluoride initiative backers - financed by Seattle powers with well-laundered money passed along to…0 comments
Fluoride in water is medicine
Wed, Jun 22, 2005, 4:28 pm // Site Management
We found the nerve endings. The fluoride proponents don't like the word "medicine" as used in the June 16 post below. Of course fluoride in water is just…0 comments
We want pure clean water
Thu, Jun 16, 2005, 4:32 pm // Site Management
The fluoride proponents don't have a clue. They don't get it. When I open my water tap, I want clean water to come out, not medicine.These well-meaning folks…
0 comments
Toxic gas news seeps slowly
Fri, Jun 27, 2003, 4:59 pm // John Servais
The carpenters' strike at St. Joe's Hospital continues. They are also striking several other construction sites around Bellingham. The dispute is over the construction industry association reducing th0 comments
Season’s Greetings
Tue, Dec 24, 2002, 10:39 pm // John Servais
Our annual holiday greetings to readers0 comments
New Links
Reconveyance ChallengeSalish Sea Org.
the Oatmeal
Current Interest
Community Wise BellinghamFriends of Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections
Publisher Recommended
GlobalPostLeague of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics
the Oatmeal
Local Blogs & News
Bellingham HeraldBham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch
Local Causes
Bellingham Police ActivityChuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Governments
BellinghamPort of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections
Weather & Climate
Cliff Mass Weather BlogClimate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Leisure
Adventures NWEdge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy
Good Links
Al-Jazeera onlineAlaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com
NwCitizen 1995 - 2007
Early Northwest CitizenInternet At Its Best
TEDQuiet, Offline or Dead
Bellingham RegisterCarl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers
