Obamacare and the Coming (Not Again?) Wealth TransferPermalink +
Wed, Mar 06, 2013, 10:05 am // Dick Conoboy
It is called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (short form: “Obamacare”). As with most laws nowadays, you can be sure that the effect of the law will be the polar opposite of the language in the legislation’s title. In this case Obamacare will be neither protective nor affordable.
Predictably, the cruel joke is on the American public who, for the most part, has swallowed the hype and thinks Obamacare will work. As long as our current medical industry is dishing out the care, medical insurance of the type required by the law will be next to useless against the obscene costs. But by then, medical insurers will be raking in billions in insurance premiums from the nearly 50 million now uninsured, many of whom are poor or nearly poor. It won’t matter whether the money is wrenched from their pockets or the coffers of the U.S. Treasury in the form of subsidies. The ultimate effect will be an enormous Obama-initiated transfer of wealth from these citizens [and from the government in the way of subsidies] to the grotesquely bloated medical care industry. It will amount to unarmed robbery of the public, but nobody in the health care industry will go to jail.
The salt in the wound is that insurance premiums will continue to skyrocket to pay for ballooning medical costs that have no justification in reality. These costs are yet another factor over which Obamacare will have no effect. An extensive article that appeared recently in Time Magazine tells the horrific story of medical charges. The piece, written by Steven Brill is entitled “Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us”. In the article, Brill takes apart actual hospital bills with the fury of a wild dog on a carcass, and exposes the insanity behind the often incomprehensible charges.
Brill’s partial assessment: “Unless you are protected by Medicare, the health care market is not a market at all. It’s a crapshoot. People fare differently according to circumstances they can neither control nor predict. They may have no insurance. They may have insurance, but their employer chooses their insurance plan and it may have a payout limit or not cover a drug or treatment they need. They may or may not be old enough to be on Medicare or, given the different standards of the 50 states, be poor enough to be on Medicaid. If they’re not protected by Medicare or they’re protected only partly by private insurance with high co-pays, they have little visibility into pricing, let alone control of it. They have little choice of hospitals or the services they are billed for, even if they somehow know the prices before they get billed for the services. They have no idea what their bills mean, and those who maintain the chargemasters [every hospital has its own internal price list called a “chargemaster”] couldn’t explain them if they wanted to.”
He goes on. “How much of the bills they end up paying may depend on the generosity of the hospital or on whether they happen to get the help of a billing advocate. They have no choice of the drugs that they have to buy or the lab tests or CT scans that they have to get, and they would not know what to do if they did have a choice. They are powerless buyers in a seller’s market where the only sure thing is the profit of the sellers.”
Obamacare will not cure this. There will be no single payer system to stand up to this pricing farce. Obama already negotiated with himself in his head and turned his “health” bill over to the insurance companies. It is corporate welfare at its finest. This, then, is the double whammy: unaffordable mandatory insurance coupled with unspeakably high medical costs.
According to another article, (Obmacare: Devils in the Details) on the website of Paul Craig Roberts of the Institute for Political Economy, “… [T]he cost of using the mandated policies will be prohibitive because of the large deductibles and co-pays. Many Americans will find themselves not only with a policy they can’t afford, but also with one they cannot afford to use. Those who cannot afford the insurance, even with a subsidy, will be faced with a costly penalty, and in many cases, this, too, will be difficult, if not impossible, to pay. As each year’s subsidy is based on last year’s income, there will be a substantial year-end tax liability for those who must repay the subsidy in whole or part because their income increased during the year. The stress alone from such a regressive scheme is, without a doubt, not conducive to good health and well-being.”
Roberts predicts, “Obama will rue the day that his name was put on this special interest legislation, and most Americans, once they realize what has been done to them, will be angry that special interests again prevailed over the health of the nation.”
I urge you to read both articles at the links above. Send copies to members of your family and, especially, provide them to your children or grandchildren, upon whom the burden of this travesty will fall. This horrendous legislation will affect every one of us in some way, shape or form. Mostly, it will bring terrible costs and confusion to those who can least afford it. It is a rip-off destined to fatten the health insurance companies, a fact most of the legislators knew the moment it was passed. But they held their noses lest the stench overwhelm them.
Wed, Mar 06, 2013, 10:05 am // Dick ConoboyYou are not likely to escape the coming transfer of $billions from your pocket to the health insurance industry. You will get little, if anything, in return.
4 comments; last on Apr 05, 2013
Tue, Feb 26, 2013, 6:39 am // Riley SweeneyRiley details upcoming merger between PeaceHealth and a much more conservative entity
1 comments; last on Feb 26, 2013
Wed, Feb 08, 2012, 9:14 am // Guest writerThere’s no profit in searching for causes, and we know there's no real cure. But there's big money in the detection and treatment of breast cancer.
2 comments; last on Feb 11, 2012
Mon, Oct 31, 2011, 3:07 pm // Guest writerBob Ferris of Re-Sources takes a values based perspective on our community and a possible coal port.
9 comments; last on Nov 02, 2011
Mon, Nov 29, 2010, 5:16 am // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney examines facts vs beliefs and comprehensive sex education
4 comments; last on Dec 01, 2010
Sat, Mar 27, 2010, 5:45 am // Craig MayberrySome questions on health care reform to our Congressional delegation.
Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 8:42 pm // Kamalla Rose KaurMaybe NOAA knows the truth about our waterfront. Our Port of Bellingham pretends it is not toxic. But it is criminally toxic.
2 comments; last on Mar 15, 2010
Sat, Feb 27, 2010, 7:22 pm // Guest writerBy guest writer Nanette Davis, Ph.D. Elder care is a growing crisis nationally and locally.
1 comments; last on Mar 02, 2010
Wed, Jan 13, 2010, 5:59 am // Ham HayesWhat will New York's proposed salt reduction laws do for us?
Thu, Dec 31, 2009, 6:15 pm // Tip JohnsonTip writes a letter to President Obama about Health Care and about his concerns that Obama has sold us short.
8 comments; last on Jan 04, 2010
Fri, Nov 27, 2009, 9:00 pm // Craig MayberryThis is a reprint of one of my earlier posts on health care. The issue is more timely now and I thought I would re-enter it into the…
4 comments; last on Dec 13, 2009
Wed, Sep 23, 2009, 10:38 pm // Craig MayberryOne of the underlying currents of the recent discussions around health care is the role of the federal government. I thought it would be interesting to see how…
3 comments; last on Sep 25, 2009
Tue, Sep 15, 2009, 8:00 am // Craig MayberryMuch has been made of czars in the current administration; however, one czar in particular should have people from both political sides a little nervous. In a case…
4 comments; last on Sep 17, 2009
Wed, Aug 19, 2009, 12:18 am // Craig MayberryThere is an increasingly wide divide in the health care debate that at its source comes down to a fundamental disconnect between the opposing sides. While the Democrats…
4 comments; last on Aug 20, 2009
Mon, Aug 10, 2009, 9:40 pm // Craig MayberryThe health care debate seems to center on fixing two important problems. The first is the people who do not have any insurance, and the second is the…
2 comments; last on Aug 11, 2009
Thu, Aug 06, 2009, 11:11 pm // Craig Mayberry(sent to email@example.com seeking clarification before I report on people providing erroneous information on health care reform)
How are we suppose to know what is erroneous information abou
4 comments; last on Aug 07, 2009
Wed, Jul 15, 2009, 5:56 pm // Craig MayberryThe big debate in Congress is now the health care. A number of months ago I posted another option and will repost that again in the next few…
7 comments; last on Jul 20, 2009
Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 2:55 pm // John ServaisI just want anyone who comes by this site today to see a few positive and thankful words. My first thoughts were that my feelings lately are not…
1 comments; last on Nov 27, 2008
Thu, Nov 22, 2007, 3:35 pm // John ServaisThis from Lois Garlick
Happy Thanksgiving to everyone.
And thank you. Your support in my campaign for County Executive was tremendous. I had no comprehension
Tue, Jun 12, 2007, 7:03 pm // Site ManagementArmed Service veterans are twice as likely to commit suicide as civilians. Just another intangible cost of the insane war in Iraq. (It applies to all male vets…
Wed, Oct 19, 2005, 3:28 pm // John ServaisGot your attention? Time magazine has an article this week about our Bellingham fight over whether or not to put fluoride in our drinking water. It is worth…
Sat, Jul 02, 2005, 4:18 pm // Site ManagementThe link to No Forced Fluoride in Bellingham is posted to the right. The pro-fluoride initiative backers - financed by Seattle powers with well-laundered money passed along to…
Wed, Jun 22, 2005, 4:28 pm // Site ManagementWe found the nerve endings. The fluoride proponents don't like the word "medicine" as used in the June 16 post below. Of course fluoride in water is just…
Thu, Jun 16, 2005, 4:32 pm // Site ManagementThe fluoride proponents don't have a clue. They don't get it. When I open my water tap, I want clean water to come out, not medicine.
These well-meaning folks…
Fri, Jun 27, 2003, 4:59 pm // John ServaisThe carpenters' strike at St. Joe's Hospital continues. They are also striking several other construction sites around Bellingham. The dispute is over the construction industry association reducing th
Tue, Dec 24, 2002, 10:39 pm // John ServaisOur annual holiday greetings to readers
New LinksReconveyance Challenge
Salish Sea Org.
Current InterestCommunity Wise Bellingham
Friends of Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Local Blogs & NewsBellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
League of Women Voters
Western Front - WWU
Local CausesBellingham Police Activity
Chuckanut Community Forest
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
WA Conservation Voters
Port of Bellingham
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Weather & ClimateCliff Mass Weather Blog
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Edge of Sports
Famous Internet Skiers
Good LinksAl-Jazeera online
Foreign Policy in Focus
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Middle East Times
New American Century
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Project Vote Smart
Talking Points Memo
War and Piece
NwCitizen 1995 - 2007Early Northwest Citizen
Internet At Its BestTED
Quiet, Offline or DeadBellingham Register
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers